2010
DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-9333-2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New particle formation and ultrafine charged aerosol climatology at a high altitude site in the Alps (Jungfraujoch, 3580 m a.s.l., Switzerland)

Abstract: Atmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsNew particle formation and ultrafine charged aerosol climatology at a high altitude site in the Alps (Jungfraujoch, 3580 m a.s.l., Switzerland) Abstract. We investigate the formation and growth of charged aerosols clusters at Jungfraujoch, in the Swiss Alps (3580 m a.s.l.), the highest altitude site of the European EU-CAARI project intensive campaign. Charged particles and clusters (0.5 − 1.8 nm) were measured from April 2008 to April 2009 and allowed the detection of nucleati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
106
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
18
106
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Baranizadeh et al (2014) studied the effect of cloudiness on NPF events observed at SMEAR II in Hyytiälä. They concluded, in agreement with some other studies, that clouds tend to attenuate or interrupt NPF events Boulon et al, 2010;Baranizadeh et al, 2014;Nieminen et al, 2015). In this study, we eliminated one variable that limits NPF (cloudiness) in order to provide a better insight into the other quantities related to atmospheric NPF.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In particular, Baranizadeh et al (2014) studied the effect of cloudiness on NPF events observed at SMEAR II in Hyytiälä. They concluded, in agreement with some other studies, that clouds tend to attenuate or interrupt NPF events Boulon et al, 2010;Baranizadeh et al, 2014;Nieminen et al, 2015). In this study, we eliminated one variable that limits NPF (cloudiness) in order to provide a better insight into the other quantities related to atmospheric NPF.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Hõrrak et al, 2008;Hirsikko et al, 2011 and the references therein). The aircraft measurements made during the LONGREX experiment as well as the ground based-measurements at high elevation sites revealed that this cluster ion mode can be seen in the free troposphere Boulon et al, 2010). The first quantitative estimates on the concentrations of neutral sub-3 nm particles were obtained for both the continental boundary layer Lehtipalo et al, 2009) and the free troposphere .…”
Section: Atmospheric Nucleation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The field measurements brought plenty of new insight into the role of ions in atmospheric nucleation Kerminen et al, 2007;Gagné et al, 2008Gagné et al, , 2010Manninen et al, 2010;Mirme et al, 2010;Boulon et al, 2010). The contribution of charged particles to the total formation rate of 2-nm particles was usually found to be well below 10 %, but it showed substantial temporal variability both during a nucleation event and between the different event days.…”
Section: Atmospheric Nucleation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Boulon et al (2010) and Manninen et al (2010) obtained yearly averages of 5.1 nm h −1 and 3.7 nm h −1 , respectively, for sub-3 nm particles from the same one year data set measured at high altitude site Jungfraujoch, Switzerland. These two studies used a maximum concentration method but with different modifications: Manninen et al (2010) used the method described in this paper whereas Boulon et al (2010) considered the time lag between the maximum concentrations of particles in two size classes. Additionally, Manninen et al (2010) determined the GR for particle size range of 1.5-3 nm whereas Boulon et al (2010) considered size range of 1.3-3 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two studies used a maximum concentration method but with different modifications: Manninen et al (2010) used the method described in this paper whereas Boulon et al (2010) considered the time lag between the maximum concentrations of particles in two size classes. Additionally, Manninen et al (2010) determined the GR for particle size range of 1.5-3 nm whereas Boulon et al (2010) considered size range of 1.3-3 nm. The variation between the GR values obtained in these two studies is likely due to these differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%