2003
DOI: 10.1002/chin.200338218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge and Spin Diffusion in Mesoscopic Metal Wires and at Ferromagnet/Nonmagnet Interfaces

Abstract: Inorganic chemistryInorganic chemistry Z 0100 Charge and Spin Diffusion in Mesoscopic Metal Wires and at Ferromagnet/Nonmagnet Interfaces -[30 refs.]. -(JOHNSON, M.; BYERS, J.; Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 67 (2003) 12, 112/1-112/7; Nav. Res. Lab., Washington, DC 20375, USA; Eng.) -Lindner 38-218

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even in the absence of the resistive contacts, effective spin injection into a semiconductor can be achieved if the resistance mismatch is reduced by using for spin injectors either a magnetic semiconductor or a highly spin-polarized ferromagnet. 44 While there was early experimental evidence (Alvarado and Renaud, 1992) that employing resistive (tunneling) contacts could lead to an efficient spin injection, 45 a systematic understanding was provided by Rashba (2000) and supported by subsequent experimental and theoretical studies (Fert and Jaffres, 2001;Smith and Silver, 2001;Rashba, 2002b;Johnson, 2003;Johnson and Byers, 2003;Takahashi and Maekawa, 2003). As can 41 Carrier density will also be influenced by the effect of screening, which changes with the dimensionality of the spin injection geometry (Korenblum and Rashba, 2002).…”
Section: F/n Junctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even in the absence of the resistive contacts, effective spin injection into a semiconductor can be achieved if the resistance mismatch is reduced by using for spin injectors either a magnetic semiconductor or a highly spin-polarized ferromagnet. 44 While there was early experimental evidence (Alvarado and Renaud, 1992) that employing resistive (tunneling) contacts could lead to an efficient spin injection, 45 a systematic understanding was provided by Rashba (2000) and supported by subsequent experimental and theoretical studies (Fert and Jaffres, 2001;Smith and Silver, 2001;Rashba, 2002b;Johnson, 2003;Johnson and Byers, 2003;Takahashi and Maekawa, 2003). As can 41 Carrier density will also be influenced by the effect of screening, which changes with the dimensionality of the spin injection geometry (Korenblum and Rashba, 2002).…”
Section: F/n Junctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is different from the usual (quasi-)one-dimensional analysis in which spin and charge currents flow along the same paths. For a full understanding of the van der Pauw cross geometry, twodimensional modeling might be necessary (Johnson and Byers, 2003;Takahashi and Maekawa, 2003).…”
Section: Spin Injection Into Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation