Characterizing Tweet Volume and Content About Common Health Conditions Across Pennsylvania: Retrospective Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundTweets can provide broad, real-time perspectives about health and medical diagnoses that can inform disease surveillance in geographic regions. Less is known, however, about how much individuals post about common health conditions or what they post about.ObjectiveWe sought to collect and analyze tweets from 1 state about high prevalence health conditions and characterize the tweet volume and content.MethodsWe collected 408,296,620 tweets originating in Pennsylvania from 2012-2015 and compared the prevalence of 14 common diseases to the frequency of disease mentions on Twitter. We identified and corrected bias induced due to variance in disease term specificity and used the machine learning approach of differential language analysis to determine the content (words and themes) most highly correlated with each disease.ResultsCommon disease terms were included in 226,802 tweets (174,381 tweets after disease term correction). Posts about breast cancer (39,156/174,381 messages, 22.45%; 306,127/12,702,379 prevalence, 2.41%) and diabetes (40,217/174,381 messages, 23.06%; 2,189,890/12,702,379 prevalence, 17.24%) were overrepresented on Twitter relative to disease prevalence, whereas hypertension (17,245/174,381 messages, 9.89%; 4,614,776/12,702,379 prevalence, 36.33%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (1648/174,381 messages, 0.95%; 1,083,627/12,702,379 prevalence, 8.53%), and heart disease (13,669/174,381 messages, 7.84%; 2,461,721/12,702,379 prevalence, 19.38%) were underrepresented. The content of messages also varied by disease. Personal experience messages accounted for 12.88% (578/4487) of prostate cancer tweets and 24.17% (4046/16,742) of asthma tweets. Awareness-themed tweets were more often about breast cancer (9139/39,156 messages, 23.34%) than asthma (1040/16,742 messages, 6.21%). Tweets about risk factors were more often about heart disease (1375/13,669 messages, 10.06%) than lymphoma (105/4927 messages, 2.13%).ConclusionsTwitter provides a window into the Web-based visibility of diseases and how the volume of Web-based content about diseases varies by condition. Further, the potential value in tweets is in the rich content they provide about individuals’ perspectives about diseases (eg, personal experiences, awareness, and risk factors) that are not otherwise easily captured through traditional surveys or administrative data.

Expressed Symptoms and Attitudes Toward Using Twitter for Health Care Engagement Among Patients With Lupus on Social Media: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

“…On Twitter, for example, health surveillance researchers have used this data to gain insight into public perspectives on a variety of diseases and health topics such as influenza, autism, schizophrenia, smoking, and HIV/AIDS [ 26 - 31 ]. In some cases, social media user data demonstrated a correlation between disease prevalence and frequency with which Twitter users discussed a disease [ 32 ]. The investigators are not aware of lupus-related surveillance research that involved the social network Twitter.…”

Leveraging Data Analytics to Advance Personal, Population, and System Health

“…In addition to the data generated from clinical encounters, we have untold amounts of data generated from health-related social media messages and the burgeoning area of patient (consumer) generated data from devices like Fitbit activity trackers. Globally, the social media platform Twitter alone generates approximately 280,000 health-related tweets per day [5,6] and a third of Facebook users post about health experiences [7], while Fitbits, one of many consumer health wearables linked to only one of over 165,000 health and fitness mobile apps that generate health data [7], have already captured over 150 billion hours of heart data [8]. So, we have big data in health care (maybe not in the form we thought we would have), but we are still sadly lacking in intelligence in the form of insight or actionable information.…”

Perspectives Toward Seeking Treatment Among Patients With Psoriasis: Protocol for a Twitter Content Analysis

“…On Twitter, for example, health surveillance researchers have used these data to gain insight into public perspectives on a variety of diseases and health topics such as influenza, autism, schizophrenia, smoking, HIV/AIDS, and sun-related issues and skin cancer [ 24 - 30 ]. In some cases, social media user data demonstrated a correlation between the disease prevalence and frequency with which Twitter users discussed a disease [ 31 ]. The use of PGHD from social media offers a new opportunity to learn about patients’ disease experience and networks that are not otherwise easily captured through traditional surveys or administrative data [ 32 ].…”