1996
DOI: 10.1016/1350-4533(95)00005-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing three-dimensional topography of engineering and biomaterial surfaces by confocal laser scanning and stylus techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used SEM, a confocal laser scanner (TopScan 3D) and an atomic force microscope (AFM) to characterize the different ceramic surfaces. TopScan 3D has previously been described [36], and proven to be an appropriate method for topographical characterization of biomaterials [37]. The best possible resolution in horizontal axes (X and Y) is 0.5 mm and in height (Z) axis is 6 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used SEM, a confocal laser scanner (TopScan 3D) and an atomic force microscope (AFM) to characterize the different ceramic surfaces. TopScan 3D has previously been described [36], and proven to be an appropriate method for topographical characterization of biomaterials [37]. The best possible resolution in horizontal axes (X and Y) is 0.5 mm and in height (Z) axis is 6 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D parameter [8] values for two of the surfaces an original in vivo and a replica measurement are given in Figure 3 shows "large area measurements" taken on both the "real" and replica surfaces. Specific features were then zoomed for higher scale analysis of the two data sets, figure 3(c) and (d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has been used widely in different fields due to the capability of CLSM to scan samples at different depths, reduce noise, and provide high resolution images. [32,33] Briefly, surface data were collected from CLSM with resolution of 512 Â 512 pixels, a pixel size of 1.51 mm, and …”
Section: Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%