2017
DOI: 10.3934/matersci.2017.3.582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the surface charge of clay minerals with Atomic Force Microscope (AFM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, there should not be any pH buffering in the background solution. Atomic force microscopy probing of surface potential on montmorillonite in 1 mM NaCl postulates the surface potential value of � À 63 mV, [54] which is quite close by magnitude to the predicted potential 69 mV 2 at the distance 14.8 nm at which the predicted diffuse proton concentration attains the same value as the background electrolyte in the cited experiment (Figure 4c "only surface layer, no gel" pK 3; this curve corresponds to a planar solid electrolyte with relatively far-spanning open space in front of it, which is an adequate model for the cited AFM experiment). Known data concerning typical surface area, [55] acid sites content and their strength [56] in montmorillonite suggest that our model's numeric parameters like acid sites surface concentration and their pK (see caption of Figure 4) are reasonably accurate to describe the real mineral.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, there should not be any pH buffering in the background solution. Atomic force microscopy probing of surface potential on montmorillonite in 1 mM NaCl postulates the surface potential value of � À 63 mV, [54] which is quite close by magnitude to the predicted potential 69 mV 2 at the distance 14.8 nm at which the predicted diffuse proton concentration attains the same value as the background electrolyte in the cited experiment (Figure 4c "only surface layer, no gel" pK 3; this curve corresponds to a planar solid electrolyte with relatively far-spanning open space in front of it, which is an adequate model for the cited AFM experiment). Known data concerning typical surface area, [55] acid sites content and their strength [56] in montmorillonite suggest that our model's numeric parameters like acid sites surface concentration and their pK (see caption of Figure 4) are reasonably accurate to describe the real mineral.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smectite belongs to the class of aluminum phyllosilicates. Generally, the surface charge of clay minerals at neutral pH is negative 41 because of the presence of dissociated surface hydroxyl groups. The sensors consist of an AT-cut quartz crystal disk (14 mm in diameter) with metal electrodes deposited on both sides.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface chemistry of clay minerals can now be described by two processes like physisorption and chemisorption of molecules and ions which takes place in the interlayer space and at the edges of the clay mineral layers. For better description of the surface properties, surface electric properties like surface potential and surface charge density are required [71,72].…”
Section: Surface Charge Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%