Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3184407.3184437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the Performance of Concurrent Virtualized Network Functions with OVS-DPDK, FD.IO VPP and SR-IOV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another interesting work [14], VPP, OVS and SR-IOV are compared with respect to scalability in the number of VMs on a single host. Other works exist in the area, but a complete state of the art review is out of the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another interesting work [14], VPP, OVS and SR-IOV are compared with respect to scalability in the number of VMs on a single host. Other works exist in the area, but a complete state of the art review is out of the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NFs typically require the routine processing of packets involving intense Input/Output (I/O) activities into and out of the compute platform [84]. Since GPC platforms are not fundamentally designed for packet processing, GPC platforms require additional acceleration techniques for effective high-speed packet processing [85].…”
Section: ) Acceleration Of Nfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…III-B) with several compression engine instances to achieve concurrent processing. Nitrox acceleration per device achieves 40 Gbps for IPsec, 300K Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA) Operations/second (Ops/s) for 1024 bit keys, and 25 Gbps for GZIP/LZS compression along with support for single root input/output virtualization (SR-IOV) [84], [175] virtualization.…”
Section: ) Cryptography and Compression Accelerator (Cca)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scalability of various virtual switching solutions with respect to the number of VMs deployed on the same host has been addressed in another recent work (Pitaev et al, 2018), in which VPP and OVS have been compared against SR-IOV. From their evaluations, they concluded that SR-IOV can sustain a greater number of VMs with respect to softwarebased solutions, since the total throughput of the system scales almost linearly with the number of VMs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%