2017
DOI: 10.1115/1.4038120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the Influence of Impeller Exit Recirculation on Centrifugal Compressor Work Input

Abstract: Impeller recirculation is a loss which has long been considered in one-dimensional (1D) modeling; however, the full extent of its impact on stage performance has not been analyzed. Recirculation has traditionally been considered purely as a parasitic (or external) loss, i.e., one which absorbs work but does not contribute to total pressure rise across the stage. Having extensively analyzed the impact of recirculation on the impeller exit flow field, it was possible to show that it has far-reaching consequences… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, traditional models derived from the relative eddy approach, such as Wiesner's model, are dependent only on the impeller geometry and cannot capture the variation of slip factor with operating conditions driven by equations ( 14) and (15). Some recent relative eddy approaches have incorporated the impeller exit flow coefficient to account for the variation of slip factor with operating conditions [9,21], but these methods dilute the influence of the machine Mach number in equation (15). The variation of the exit flow coefficient throughout the compressor map is usually small relative to the range of machine Mach numbers available to high-speed compressors, and furthermore, the machine Mach number is raised to a larger power than the exit flow coefficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, traditional models derived from the relative eddy approach, such as Wiesner's model, are dependent only on the impeller geometry and cannot capture the variation of slip factor with operating conditions driven by equations ( 14) and (15). Some recent relative eddy approaches have incorporated the impeller exit flow coefficient to account for the variation of slip factor with operating conditions [9,21], but these methods dilute the influence of the machine Mach number in equation (15). The variation of the exit flow coefficient throughout the compressor map is usually small relative to the range of machine Mach numbers available to high-speed compressors, and furthermore, the machine Mach number is raised to a larger power than the exit flow coefficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stodola's [1] original method used geometry to predict the size of the relative eddy, and by extension, the slip factor associated with a given impeller design. Most models available in the literature have followed Stodola's approach and primarily rely on the impeller geometry to predict the behavior of a highly unsteady, three-dimensional flow field at the impeller exit [2,9,11,12,14,21]. Due to errors and inconsistencies in predicting the behavior of a complex flow field chiefly from geometry, as well as limited success in predicting slip at off-design conditions, there is significant room for improvement in the prediction of slip factor.…”
Section: V02et39a003-2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests were conducted using a turbocharger test rig located in Queen's University Belfast (QUB); further details on the test rig can be found in Harley et al [5] and Stuart et al [6]. The QUB test rig conformed to the SAE J1826 standard for hot gas stand testing of turbochargers [7]; this is the industry standard for the testing of passenger vehicle turbochargers.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 14) and (15). Some recent relative eddy approaches have incorporated the impeller exit flow coefficient to account for the variation of slip factor with operating conditions [9,21], but these methods dilute the influence of the machine Mach number in Eq. (15).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stodola's [1] original method used geometry to predict the size of the relative eddy, and by extension, the slip factor associated with a given impeller design. Most models available in the literature have followed Stodola's approach and primarily rely on the impeller geometry to predict the behavior of a highly unsteady, three-dimensional flow field at the impeller exit [2,9,11,12,14,21]. Due to errors and inconsistencies in predicting the behavior of a complex flow field chiefly from geometry, as well as limited success in predicting slip at off-design conditions, there is significant room for improvement in the prediction of slip factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%