2002
DOI: 10.5594/j15330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the Flashing Television Images that Precipitate Seizures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rationale for these restrictions is contained in a paper summarising all previous studies (Binnie et al, 2002;Wilkins et al, 2005).…”
Section: Broadcast Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale for these restrictions is contained in a paper summarising all previous studies (Binnie et al, 2002;Wilkins et al, 2005).…”
Section: Broadcast Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, panel 2, it is possible to estimate the proportion of patients affected by patterns that occupy different areas of the screen, bearing in mind the simplifying assumptions outlined earlier. After previous work (6), we assume that 100% of patients is affected by patterns that occupy all of the screen of a 20‐inch television (diametric measurement). The proportion affected by patterns that occupy one half, one fourth, one eighth, and one tenth of the screen area can be calculated on the basis of Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Spatial Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data were obtained by using a stationary pattern (Ref. 2, p. 20) and differ from those used previously to estimate the effects of flicker (6).…”
Section: Effects Of Spatial Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Monarch Instrument Nova-Strobe PBL strobe light was used to simulate temporal sampling at different frame (flash) rates. To reduce the risk of photosensitive epilepsy, the lowest flash rate of the strobe was set to 60 Hz [25]. To ensure that impulsive sampling was simulated, the duty cycle of the strobe (akin to the shutter angle of a video camera) was set such that the distance traveled by the line within a flash was always smaller than the spatial acuity of the human eye, which we assumed to be 1 arc min as a worse case scenario [27].…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%