Characterizing a data model for software measurement

Chirinos, Ledis; Losavio, Francisca; Bøegh, Jørgen

doi:10.1016/j.jss.2004.01.019

Cited by 22 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other models [22] [24] are also different from our model in the points. Table II shows whether or not our model and these models satisfy requirements of a model for project supervision explained in section II (Similar comparison was also done in [6] to clarify differences of past researches). In the table, "Yes" of each cell means a model written in the column satisfies a requirement written in the row, and "No" means not satisfy.…”

Section: (C1) Period: In Later Processmentioning

confidence: 88%

“…Chirinos et al [6] proposed the model for software measurement (MOSME) which can express objective, data collection activities, and analysis activities. The model has elements which explain collecting and interpreting data in detail.…”

Section: (C1) Period: In Later Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, Chirinos et al [6] proposed the software measurement model which defines elements such as type of metrics, range of value, and measurement method, but it does not include elements related to act phase. To get the effects of project analyzing and addressing issues, activities of act phase is indispensable, and therefore, description capability of the act phase is required for the model of project supervision.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Model of Project Supervision for Process Correction and Improvement

Tsunoda

Monden

Matsumura

et al. 2011

2011 Joint Conference of the 21st International Workshop on Software Measurement and the 6th International Conference on Softwa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Recently, software functional size becomes larger, and consequently, not only a software developer but also a software purchaser suffers considerable losses by software project failure. So avoiding project failure is also important for purchasers. Project supervision (monitoring and control) is expected for the purchaser to suppress risk of project failure. It is performed by sharing software metrics during the project for the purchaser to grasp the status of the project, and corrective actions are done based on analysis results of the metrics. Although there are some software measurement models, the models are not enough to describe how to confirm effects of project supervision. To acquire the effects certainly, the purchaser and the developer should quantitatively confirm whether the effects are acquired or not by project supervision. In addition, the models cannot represent corrective actions when symptoms of project failure are found. We propose the model for project supervision. The model explains planning, collecting data, transforming data, analyzing data, reaction toward found issues, and confirming effect of project supervision. With our model, project supervision can be described more rigorously.

show abstract

Section: (C1) Period: In Later Processmentioning

confidence: 88%

Section: (C1) Period: In Later Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Model of Project Supervision for Process Correction and Improvement

Tsunoda

Monden

Matsumura

et al. 2011

2011 Joint Conference of the 21st International Workshop on Software Measurement and the 6th International Conference on Softwa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In order to standardize the discussions and put self-healing in the context, we use the internationally adopted standard for developing measurement programs ISO/IEC 15939 (Software and Systems Engineering measurement processes) [OC07]. An alternative to ISO/IEC 15939 method for defining measures was presented by Chirinos et al [CLB05], which is based on a meta-model The basic control of the quality of the information is done by a separate set of VBA scripts (Information quality) and the result of the control is visualized as one of the indicators on the main page.…”

Section: Information Productsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement-as-a-Service – A New Way of Organizing Measurement Programs in Large Software Development Companies

Staron

Meding

2015

Software Measurement

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Modern software development companies focus on their primary business objectives, delivering customer value and customer satisfaction which often leads to prioritization of core business areas over such areas as measurement. Although the companies recognize the need and importance of software measurement, they often do not have the competence and/or time to focus on software measurement. In this paper we address the challenge of optimizing the measurement processes in modern companies by using cloud computing and by providing measurement (process) as a service for core business of the companies. Similar to the concept of Software-as-a-Service we define the concept Measurementas-a-Service and describe how to organize a measurement program according to this definition. The Measurement-as-a-Service concept is wellaligned with measurement programs developed according to ISO/IEC 15939 and can help the companies to increase the benefits obtained from the efficient use of metrics.

show abstract

“…The key to the process metrics analysis is to analyze the actual effort, schedule, deviation of cost and plan, and defects during the project [11], [12]. Table 2 shows a sample of such metrics provided in [11].…”

Section: Process Metricmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design and Development of Software Configuration Management Tool to Support Process Performance Monitoring and Analysis

Cline

Lee

2007

Computational Science – ICCS 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Most SCM tools underestimate the potential ability of monitoring and reporting the performance of various software process activities, and delegate implementation of such capabilities to other CASE tools. This paper discusses how SCM tool can be extended and implemented to provide valuable SCM information (e.g., metric data) in monitoring the performance of various process areas. With the extended SCM tool capability, stakeholders can measure, analyze, and report the performance of process activities even without using the expensive CASE tools.

show abstract

Characterizing a data model for software measurement

Cited by 22 publications

References 10 publications

A Model of Project Supervision for Process Correction and Improvement

A Model of Project Supervision for Process Correction and Improvement

Measurement-as-a-Service – A New Way of Organizing Measurement Programs in Large Software Development Companies

Design and Development of Software Configuration Management Tool to Support Process Performance Monitoring and Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About