1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0026-2692(98)00038-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization, simulation and macro-modelling of vertical Hall devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum offset of the proposed folded vertical Hall device is 0.29 mV in type 5. This value is smaller than that of [20], 33.3 mV, and that of [21], 10 mV. Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The minimum offset of the proposed folded vertical Hall device is 0.29 mV in type 5. This value is smaller than that of [20], 33.3 mV, and that of [21], 10 mV. Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In this context, we recently developed a compact model of the electrical behavior of the VHD [5]. This model differs from other modeling approaches [6][7][8] (finite element modeling, lumped circuit ...) by its relative simplicity: it consists in 10 non-linear resistors and it is tuned through 14 parameters (7 of them being related to the geometry, 5 to the technology, and 2 are fitting parameters) [5]. Among all physical effects that alter the response of the sensor, the zero-tesla offset is one of the most critical [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, most of the existing VHD compact models are derived from HHD models, as for the Randjelovic's model [6]. This approach is interesting but remains nevertheless too rough to observe the phenomenon at the origin of distortions in the electrical response of the sensor (non-linearity, offset).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%