2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-016-0165-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Wind Meandering in Low-Wind-Speed Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
52
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
11
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio between q and p represents the looping parameter m: m=qp. Values of m<1 indicate that the turbulent exponential decay prevails on the oscillating part of the EAF, whereas values of m>1 indicate boundary‐layer dynamics in which non‐turbulent wave‐like motions play an important role. Mortarini et al ., (, ) classified as “meandering” episodes those hours when mu, mv and mT are simultaneously larger than 1, and as “non‐meandering” episodes those hours when the theoretical formulation (Equation ) is not able to fit the observed EAF. (Cava et al ., give a detailed description of the fitting method.)…”
Section: Identification Of Meandering and Gravity Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ratio between q and p represents the looping parameter m: m=qp. Values of m<1 indicate that the turbulent exponential decay prevails on the oscillating part of the EAF, whereas values of m>1 indicate boundary‐layer dynamics in which non‐turbulent wave‐like motions play an important role. Mortarini et al ., (, ) classified as “meandering” episodes those hours when mu, mv and mT are simultaneously larger than 1, and as “non‐meandering” episodes those hours when the theoretical formulation (Equation ) is not able to fit the observed EAF. (Cava et al ., give a detailed description of the fitting method.)…”
Section: Identification Of Meandering and Gravity Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since meandering motions are generally related to large variations of the wind direction, they may significantly influence the scalar horizontal dispersion, in particular in low wind speed and in very stable conditions or, in general, in the presence of weak vertical turbulent mixing (Anfossi et al ., ; Mahrt and Mills, ; Mortarini et al ., ). Though meandering modes are more common in stable atmospheric stratification at night‐time, they have also been observed during daytime in calm conditions (Anfossi et al ., ; Oettl et al ., ; Vickers et al ., ; Mortarini et al ., ). Nonetheless, the physical causes responsible for horizontal meandering are not yet well understood in both stable and unstable atmospheric stratifications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are presented in Table 1. [4]. The characteristic values of the meandering phenomenon are exhibited in Table 1, which can be used in Eqs.…”
Section: Reproducing Observed Meandering Autocorrelation Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This looping pattern with the presence of negative lobes in autocorrelation functions, which characterize the meandering observed phenomenon, can be well reproduced by particular mathematical formulations. With this good fit, it is possible to estimate the principal physical variables that specify the meandering flow [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meandering enhanced dispersion occurring in low wind conditions (U < 1.5 m/s) [1], characterized by low frequency horizontal wind oscillations, is a relevant mechanism to describe the diffusion of atmospheric contaminants [2]. Thus, the horizontal wind meandering phenomenon is an important physical component that must be incorporated in air pollution models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%