2022
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.998051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of white matter over 1–2 years in small vessel disease using MR-based quantitative susceptibility mapping and free-water mapping

Abstract: PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate alterations in white matter lesions (WMLs) and normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) with small vessel disease (SVD) over 1–2 years using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and free-water (FW) mapping.MethodsFifty-one SVD patients underwent MRI brain scans and neuropsychological testing both at baseline and follow-up. The main approach for treating these patients is the management of risk factors. Quantitative susceptibility (QS), fractional anisotropy (FA)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among new and advanced neuroimaging techniques, in future studies it would be interesting to use the technique of Quantitative Susceptibility mapping (QSM). This method has been widely used for the quantification of cSS and CMBs in cSVD and it allow the detection of a higher number of CMBs and the differentiation of CMBs from calcifications 36 , 37 . A third limitation pertains the possibility that our inclusion criteria could results in potential selection biases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among new and advanced neuroimaging techniques, in future studies it would be interesting to use the technique of Quantitative Susceptibility mapping (QSM). This method has been widely used for the quantification of cSS and CMBs in cSVD and it allow the detection of a higher number of CMBs and the differentiation of CMBs from calcifications 36 , 37 . A third limitation pertains the possibility that our inclusion criteria could results in potential selection biases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%