2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the Physiological Displacement of the Aortic Arch Using Non-Rigid Registration and MR Imaging

Abstract: The present results showed important deformations in the ostia of supra-aortic vessels during the cardiac cycle. It seems that aortic arch motions should be taken into account when designing and manufacturing fenestrated endografts. The elastic registration method provides more precise results, but is more complex and time-consuming than other methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even in cases with non-tortuous anatomy, there may be a mismatch between the fused image and angiography, which in our opinion remains essential for validating the fusion (7 ml to 30 ml/s suffice at the proximal landing zone). As long as registration is based on bony structures (hence with rigid transformations), there will be a mismatch with arterial structures which by nature are soft and deformable, which therefore calls for approaches based on elastic registration (27), for example, or digital simulation approaches that predict deformations using a biomechanical model. We have already published several studies on this simulation approach (10,11), which is integrated into the…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in cases with non-tortuous anatomy, there may be a mismatch between the fused image and angiography, which in our opinion remains essential for validating the fusion (7 ml to 30 ml/s suffice at the proximal landing zone). As long as registration is based on bony structures (hence with rigid transformations), there will be a mismatch with arterial structures which by nature are soft and deformable, which therefore calls for approaches based on elastic registration (27), for example, or digital simulation approaches that predict deformations using a biomechanical model. We have already published several studies on this simulation approach (10,11), which is integrated into the…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More knowledge and understanding of this new endovascular treatment technique seems requisite, since the longer term outcomes appear to be significantly inferior to other available treatment options. 5 While several studies have investigated the dynamic behaviour of the aorta, 2,16e23 including a recent study that employed deformable registration techniques for the aortic arch, 33 little has been reported on the dynamic behaviour of stent grafts. From a clinical point of view however, this information is of the utmost importance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 19 ] Misregistration is always randomly caused by peristalsis between SSTSE and TSE images even if registration techniques are applied. [ 20 , 21 ] Hence, it is difficult to optimize the training dataset of SSTSE and TSE images and accuracy cannot be gained. Instead, input images were generated from TSE images to simulate SSTSE images by contrast-adjustment, downsampling, adding noise, and blurring images with image processing software (ImageJ version 1.52a; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) as performed in several studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%