1985
DOI: 10.1016/0028-3908(85)90027-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the hyperalgesic effect induced by intrathecal injection of substance P

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison, intrathecal administration of substance P 100 nmol significantly produced pronociceptive/hyperalgesic effects, manifested as reduced tail-withdrawal latencies in 46°C water. These results agree with rodent studies, indicating that intrathecal substance P causes hyperalgesic effects 27,30. Intrathecal administration of substance P and N/OFQ both produced a similar degree of hyperalgesic effects, as shown by decreased response latency approximately for 2 to 3 seconds in rodents 30,39.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For comparison, intrathecal administration of substance P 100 nmol significantly produced pronociceptive/hyperalgesic effects, manifested as reduced tail-withdrawal latencies in 46°C water. These results agree with rodent studies, indicating that intrathecal substance P causes hyperalgesic effects 27,30. Intrathecal administration of substance P and N/OFQ both produced a similar degree of hyperalgesic effects, as shown by decreased response latency approximately for 2 to 3 seconds in rodents 30,39.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Moreover, the electrical stimulation of thin, unmyelinated afferent (C-) fibres (Go and Yaksh, 1987;Brodin et al, 1987;Klein et al, 1992) or the administration of capsaicin (Go and Yaksh, 1987;Takano et al, 1993) have each been found to result in the release of substance P. Further evidence that substance P acts as a neurotransmitter for pain is that NK1 receptor antagonists block the responses of spinal cord neurons elicited by the different noxious stimuli (Snider et al, 1991;Radhakrishnan and Henry, 1991). Moreover, the intrathecal administration of substance P was found to induce pain behaviour in animals (Piercey et al, 1981;Hylden and Wilcox, 1983;Matsamura et al, 1985).…”
Section: Substance P: Neurotransmitter or Neuromodulator?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substance P, an undecapeptide, is widely distributed in the brain (Hokfelt et al 1978). It is a potent vasodepressor agent when injected intravenously (Maggi et al 1985) and causes a hyperalgesic effect given intrathecally (Matsumura et al 1985). However, it is still not clear whether captopril does interfere with substance P metabolism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%