2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta00287a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the adsorption site energies and heterogeneous surfaces of porous materials

Abstract: Heterogeneity of porous structures is an important material property involved during the design of adsorbents, catalysts and molecular recognition materials. This review discusses the mathematical methods that can characterize adsorption site energies and surface heterogeneity from the adsorption isotherms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
87
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…64,65 Better correlation coefficient r 2 = 0.991 for the Langmuir model ( Figure 3f) supported our hypothesis that uranyl molecules were diffused through the NNRG and allowed monolayer adsorption on the finite number of identical sites of NNRG. 65,67,70 Freundlich model with poor correlation coefficient r 2 =0.514 (Figure 3f), further confirmed that multilayer adsorption was not happening. Sips model (Langmuir-Freundlich model) with moderate fitting and evaluated value of n = 1.03 suggested adsorption of ~1 uranyl molecule per free adsorbent site ( Figure 3f).…”
Section: Isotherms For Uranium Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…64,65 Better correlation coefficient r 2 = 0.991 for the Langmuir model ( Figure 3f) supported our hypothesis that uranyl molecules were diffused through the NNRG and allowed monolayer adsorption on the finite number of identical sites of NNRG. 65,67,70 Freundlich model with poor correlation coefficient r 2 =0.514 (Figure 3f), further confirmed that multilayer adsorption was not happening. Sips model (Langmuir-Freundlich model) with moderate fitting and evaluated value of n = 1.03 suggested adsorption of ~1 uranyl molecule per free adsorbent site ( Figure 3f).…”
Section: Isotherms For Uranium Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…71 The discrepancies here in pK1 fitted q e (233.7 mg/g) and q e(exp) (297 mg/g), shows an underestimation of binding sites, suggesting the rate of reaction is not diffusion controlled and adsorption here cannot be classified as truly pseudo 1 st order. 67,70,71 Whereas, the adsorption capacity obtained from pK2 fitting q e = 259.4 mg/g is relatively closer to the true adsorption capacity at equilibrium (297 mg/g). The adsorption is driven by the pseudo 2 nd order kinetics and the rate limiting step in attaining the equilibrium is chemisorption involving the valence forces through the exchange of electrons between NNRG and U, complexation, coordination and/or chelation.…”
Section: Kinetics Of Uranium Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The binding isotherms were calculated using the SigmaPlot 12 (Systat Software Inc., Richmond, CA, USA). Non-linear least-square fitting was applied to the averaged experimental data, using a simple Langmuir isotherm model [21,22]:…”
Section: Equilibrium Batch Rebindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porous materials possess extensive interior for carrying out a wide variety of chemical processes in confined space. These include adsorption, [1][2][3] catalysis, [4][5][6] and ion transport, [7][8][9] during which the formation of new chemical bonds and the variation of intermolecular interactions constantly perturb the are responsive to even subtle changes in pore environment, making architectural damage a common cause of material deterioration in prolonged use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%