Cyclic conformational changes in the myosin head are considered essential for muscle contraction. We hereby show that the extension of the fluorescence resonance energy transfer method described originally by Taylor The cyclic interaction between actin and myosin is thought to provide the molecular basis for muscle contraction (2). There have been numerous attempts to characterize the molecular events underlying the contractile acto-myosin interaction (3). The recent availability of high resolution atomic structures of the actin monomer (4), the actin filament (5-7), myosin S1 (8), and the acto-S1 complex (9) provided a framework for the description of conformational changes associated with the contractile cycle.The atomic models permit the study of proximity relationships between various sites in the acto-myosin complex. An alternative method for studying proximal relationships within a macromolecule is FRET 1 spectroscopy. Several interprotein distances within the acto-myosin complex have been already determined with this latter method (10 -14). The distance between Cys-374 of actin and Cys-707 of S1 under rigor conditions was found to be 60 (11), 50 (12, 15), and 51 Å (14). By the use of scallop myosin hybrid molecules this distance was determined to be 45 Å (16). The distance between Cys-374 of actin and Cys-177 in the ELC of S1 in rigor was measured to be 50 (11) and 60 Å (10). FRET spectroscopy was applied to determine the radial coordinate, i.e. the distance from the imaginary axis of a labeled side chain within the actin filament, where special symmetry conditions are fulfilled (1). The radial coordinate of a number of points in the actin filament and proximal relationships in the S1-and heavy meromyosin-decorated actin filament was determined by this approach (1,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23).Although FRET spectroscopy and x-ray crystallography are significantly different methods, there is usually a good correlation between the distances calculated from the atomic model and the ones obtained by . Accordingly, most of the FRET data obtained in the case of actin and acto-myosin are in a reasonably good agreement with the distances obtained by using the atomic models (5-7, 9). However, an exception is the distance between Cys-177 on ELC of S1 and Cys-374 on the actin filament, because FRET revealed 50 -60 Å (10, 11), whereas the atomic model resulted in ϳ89 Å (9). Although this discrepancy may originate from biologically irrelevant factors (e.g. the nonzero size of the FRET probes (24)), the problem deserves further investigations because of the central role of the light chainbinding domain of S1 in the force generating process (9,27,28).In the present work we analyze the proximity relationships in the rigor acto-S1 complex, with a particular focus on the conformational distributions of the light chain-binding domain associated with a donor-acceptor distance distribution. The FRET method, developed originally by Taylor et al. (1) for radial coordinate determinations in actin filament, was extended to obtai...