2008
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2008.915592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Surface-Breaking Cracks Using One Tangential Component of Magnetic Leakage Field Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different lift-off studies also carried out and concluded that the 0.1 mm distance between the specimen and sensor is the optimum lift-off to detect the defect [10] terize the rectangular shape defect on the ferromagnetic material using tangential component of the leakage profile. Normalization of the leakage profile has been carried to compare the numerical and experimental results [11]. COMSOL based numerical studies have been carried out for a magnetizer arrangement with dimension mentioned in this paper to produce the uniform magnetic field on outer wall on the inspected specimen while the probe is placed inside the pipe [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different lift-off studies also carried out and concluded that the 0.1 mm distance between the specimen and sensor is the optimum lift-off to detect the defect [10] terize the rectangular shape defect on the ferromagnetic material using tangential component of the leakage profile. Normalization of the leakage profile has been carried to compare the numerical and experimental results [11]. COMSOL based numerical studies have been carried out for a magnetizer arrangement with dimension mentioned in this paper to produce the uniform magnetic field on outer wall on the inspected specimen while the probe is placed inside the pipe [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of MFL testing small magnetic field sensors are required. Besides NDT-applications using SQUID-magnetometer [3,4], Hall-sensors [5], or Fluxgate probes [6], MR sensors (magneto resistance) are applied to detect even small defects with geometries in the μm-range. Especially, giant magneto resistance (GMR) [7,8] and tunnel magneto resistance/magnetic tunnel junction (TMR/MTJ) [9] are used as sensors for NDT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the traditional measurement of 2D magnetic fields cannot accurately characterize natural defects. Regarding this specific subject, Zuoying et al [10], Li et al [11], and Amineh et al [12,13] conducted the measurement of 3D magnetic fields for better characterization. * Correspondence: sadr@iust.ac.ir…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%