2016
DOI: 10.4283/jmag.2016.21.3.437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dipole Model to Predict the Rectangular Defect on Ferromagnetic Pipe

Abstract: Dipole model based analytical expression is proposed to estimate the length and depth of the rectangular defect on ferromagnetic pipe. Among the three leakage profiles of Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL), radial and axial leakage profiles are considered in this work. Permeability variation of the specimen is ignored by considering the flux density as close to saturation level of the inspected specimen. Comparing the profile of both the components, radial leakage profile furnishes the better estimation of defect par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of defect size on the MFL signal has been analyzed using analytical models, simulations, and experiments [ 8 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. It was suggested by Förster that [ 8 ], when using the magnetic dipole model to analyze the influence of defect dimension, the magnetic charge density should also change with defect dimension to obtain more accurate results: where F nl is a non-linear factor and H a is the applied field.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Mfl Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of defect size on the MFL signal has been analyzed using analytical models, simulations, and experiments [ 8 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. It was suggested by Förster that [ 8 ], when using the magnetic dipole model to analyze the influence of defect dimension, the magnetic charge density should also change with defect dimension to obtain more accurate results: where F nl is a non-linear factor and H a is the applied field.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Mfl Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) is the most popular magnetic sensing method used in this study to investigate defect features, including width, depth, and area. In the past, magnetic flux leakage (MFL) has been used for testing pipelines [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ] and inspecting plates [ 26 , 27 ], tubes [ 28 , 29 , 30 ], wire ropes [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ], rail tracks [ 36 ], tank floors [ 37 , 38 ], and suspension bridge stay cables [ 39 ] made up of ferromagnetic material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recientemente, el modelo dipolomagnético de muesca rectangular fue revisado para ilustrar el impacto de la concentración de esfuerzos en las señales MMM (Huang, Jiang, Yang & Liu, 2014). Suresh & Abudhair (2016) proponen una expresión analítica basada en el modelo de dipolos para estimar la longitud y la profundidad del defecto rectangular en la tubería ferromagnética. Leng, Xing, Zhou & Gao (2013) propusieron un modelo de dipolo magnético lineal para representar la distribución del campo electromagnético de fuga debido a la concentración de tensiones en una placa con muesca en V. Así mismo, Jiancheng, Minqiang, Jianwei & Jianzhong (2010) determinan que las diferentes características de las señales magnéticas en la región elástica-plástica -esto fue explicado por referencia a la muesca en forma de V modelo de dipolo magnético-indican que la técnica de memoria magnética puede identificar el daño macro y el daño temprano, lo cual es de gran importancia para asegurar el funcionamiento seguro del equipo en servicio.…”
unclassified