2022
DOI: 10.1029/2022wr033161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Subsurface Hydrogeological Structures With Convolutional Conditional Neural Processes on Limited Training Data

Abstract: The exploration of geological resources and the protection of the environment are driving geoscience research toward the large-scale complex surface and subsurface survey (Bergen et al., 2019). Hydrogeological modeling is one of the most important methods to obtain a heterogeneous and continuous understanding of subsurface hydrological phenomena (Tahmasebi, 2018). There are many cases that confirm the effectiveness of hydrogeological modeling in characterizing subsurface structures in earth sciences (Harken et… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the notable surge in the volume of observations and the rapid progression of deep learning as an advanced tool for data analysis (Cho et al., 2019), deep generative modeling techniques have facilitated significant progress in the characterization of spatial heterogeneity (Bai & Tahmasebi, 2020; Cui et al., 2022, 2023; K. Liu et al., 2019; Y. Liu et al., 2019; A. Y. Sun, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the notable surge in the volume of observations and the rapid progression of deep learning as an advanced tool for data analysis (Cho et al., 2019), deep generative modeling techniques have facilitated significant progress in the characterization of spatial heterogeneity (Bai & Tahmasebi, 2020; Cui et al., 2022, 2023; K. Liu et al., 2019; Y. Liu et al., 2019; A. Y. Sun, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geologic heterogeneity can also be characterized by assimilating dynamic data into hydraulic conductivity field using MPS (Kumar & Srinivasan, 2020). Despite the extensive applications of MPS in geological modeling, acquiring training images, especially for 3D situations, which accurately capture the actual pattern of modeling domain, remains a challenging task (Comunian et al., 2012; Cui et al., 2022). Additionally, there is always a trade‐off between the realism of simulated structural patterns and the increased demand on CPU and/or RAM incurred by tuning specific parameters in these MPS methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of the reconnaissance stage is due to the identification and separation of potential and barren areas in terms of ore mineralization; the potential areas will be lost or not identified if there is any error or lack of accuracy during this stage [5,6]. Geochemical modeling of stream sediment samples using methods such as multifractal analysis, clustering, principal component analysis (PCA), factor analysis, and artificial neural networks (ANN) is a valuable tool for mineral exploration [7][8][9][10][11]. Each method has advantages and disadvantages for geochemical modeling of stream sediment samples [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%