2019
DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2019.1619577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of sensory profile by the CATA method of Mexican coffee brew considering two preparation methods: espresso and French press

Abstract: A sensory evaluation was performed for coffee samples using the Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) method. The samples included Mexican coffee from Hidalgo and Colima states. The brews were prepared by the espresso and French press methods. The data obtained were analyzed using Cochran´s Q test in order to determine any significant differences between samples. There were significant differences (P < .05) only in visual attributes, due to intrinsic characteristics of the preparation methods of the samples. Additionall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CATA questions multiple choice, which is commonly used in marketing research in order to reduce responses. The questions contained a list of words where the panellists selected those attributes that described the samples appropriately (Espitia-López et al, 2019). The data was recorded in binary format (0 -attributes not ticked and 1 -attributes ticked) for CATA, and the rating scale of intensities for QDA was from 0 (not detected) to 5 (detected strongly).…”
Section: Preparation Of Noodlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CATA questions multiple choice, which is commonly used in marketing research in order to reduce responses. The questions contained a list of words where the panellists selected those attributes that described the samples appropriately (Espitia-López et al, 2019). The data was recorded in binary format (0 -attributes not ticked and 1 -attributes ticked) for CATA, and the rating scale of intensities for QDA was from 0 (not detected) to 5 (detected strongly).…”
Section: Preparation Of Noodlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The panelists were consumers and their average age was 22 years old. The questions for the CATA were multiple choice, which is commonly used in marketing research, in order to reduce responses (Espitia-López et al, 2019). Data is recorded in a binary format (0 -attribute not ticked, 1 -attribute ticked).…”
Section: Sensory Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both of these methods, the panelists are given a list of attributes and are asked to either check if the attribute is present or rate the attribute's intensity if it is present (Campo, Ballester, Langlois, Dacremont, & Valentin, 2010; le Fur, Mercurio, Moio, Blanquet, & Meunier, 2003). In the traditional CATA and RATA methods, the panelists are not trained to use the attributes, and there are no reference standards, in fact, the panelists are usually consumers as these methods were initially developed to understand consumer perception (see for example, English, Keough, McSweeney, & Razul, 2019; Espitia‐Lopez et al, 2019; Hamid, Shepherd, Kantono, & Spence, 2019; Jaeger et al, 2019). These methods seem to work very well when relatively large numbers of consumers are involved (60–80 consumers seem standard (Ares, Tarrega, Izquierdo, & Jaeger, 2014)) and when there are more considerable differences among the samples in the product set (Ares et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are no reference standards, in fact, the panelists are usually consumers as these methods were initially developed to understand consumer perception (see for example, English, Keough, McSweeney, & Razul, 2019;Espitia-Lopez et al, 2019;Hamid, Shepherd, Kantono, & Spence, 2019;Jaeger et al, 2019). These methods seem to work very well when relatively large numbers of consumers are involved (60-80 consumers seem standard (Ares, Tarrega, Izquierdo, & Jaeger, 2014)) and when there are more considerable differences among the samples in the product set (Ares et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%