2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)00733-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of reversed-phase columns using the linear free energy relationship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our test uses 65% methanol-35% buffer, the NIST test 80% methanol-20% buffer, and the Tanaka test 80% methanol-20% water. It is known [5] that the absolute value of the hydrophobicity parameter depends on the mobile phase composition. However, the hydrophobicity values of different packings appear to change in a consistent pattern for different reversed-phase packings [5].…”
Section: Hydrophobic Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our test uses 65% methanol-35% buffer, the NIST test 80% methanol-20% buffer, and the Tanaka test 80% methanol-20% water. It is known [5] that the absolute value of the hydrophobicity parameter depends on the mobile phase composition. However, the hydrophobicity values of different packings appear to change in a consistent pattern for different reversed-phase packings [5].…”
Section: Hydrophobic Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known [5] that the absolute value of the hydrophobicity parameter depends on the mobile phase composition. However, the hydrophobicity values of different packings appear to change in a consistent pattern for different reversed-phase packings [5]. The other issue is the fact that different probes are used.…”
Section: Hydrophobic Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the latter interaction forces have more pronounced effect on the stationary phase with shorter hydrocarbon chains (owing to the more easily accessible silica-gel surface there). 41,42 Increasing the vancomycin concentration resulted in increased retention. This trend could be observed more clearly on the C-18 stationary phase at higher chiral-selector concentration.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Enantioselective Separations Of Profementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) describe the properties of the separation system; they are defined as the difference in the properties of the stationary and mobile phases [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Coefficient v is determined by the cohesive energy of the mobile and stationary phases and reflects the effect of dispersive interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%