2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of polyethylene wear particle: The impact of methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morphology revealed rounder particles with a lower aspect ratio for TAR. We can confirm these observations for in vitro generated wear particles with no relevant size difference, but rounder particles with a lower aspect ratio for TAR compared to TKR [58,69,70]. It is known that wear particles in the submicron size range induce the highest biological reaction [71].…”
Section: Clinical Relevancesupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Morphology revealed rounder particles with a lower aspect ratio for TAR. We can confirm these observations for in vitro generated wear particles with no relevant size difference, but rounder particles with a lower aspect ratio for TAR compared to TKR [58,69,70]. It is known that wear particles in the submicron size range induce the highest biological reaction [71].…”
Section: Clinical Relevancesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…After testing was completed, wear particles were isolated using acid digestion [57][58][59]. Wear particles were then filtered on alumina filters with a pore size of 0.02 lm.…”
Section: Wear Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This second one turned out to be preferable as samples did not require any particular preparation prior to observations, whereas, in case of the high-vacuum instrument, carbon coating was required to render the samples electrically conductive and, therefore, better observable. Observation conditions, like magnification, accelerating voltage (20 KeV for our tests), beam current, etc., were selected following standard recommendations and the specific requirements deriving from the actual microstructure of each sample [32][33][34]. Both microscopes were equipped with an EDXS system, used to evaluate compositions of the observed regions.…”
Section: Materials Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Components were cleaned and measured gravimetrically according to ISO 14243:2:2009. At the end of each test, wear particles were analyzed using acid digestion according to previously published methods [23, 24]. Particles were analyzed on filters with a pore size of 20 nm using high resolution SEM (FEGSEM, Leo 1530, Leo, Oberkochen, Germany) at a magnification of 25,000.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%