[a]
1I ntroductionPlastic explosives are widely used by military units, most notably by engineers for demolition activities and by explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) teams for the blow-in-place destruction of unexploded ordnance (UXO). The wellknown plastic explosive formulation Composition C4, based on hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX), is used by many nations. RDX is very stable in the environment, water soluble and moves relatively rapidly towards surface and groundwater bodies in Ranges and Training Areas (RTA). Such properties contribute to the adverse environmental impacts of RDX which have been discovered recently [1][2][3]. The US Environmental Protection Agency has designated RDX as ap ossible human carcinogen that also targets the nervous system and can cause seizures in humans and animals when large amounts are inhaled or ingested [4].R DX ecotoxicity was also extensively studied in Canada and showed toxicity to various receptors [5,6].T herefore, North-American RDX thresholds in water bodies are low,i n the order of parts per billion [7].The Canadian Department of National Defence, like many defence organizations, are undertaking efforts to minimize the environmental impacts of their activities to ensure that RTAs remain sustainable for the completion of mandated training activities. The physicochemical properties of RDX, along with the impacts of RDX on human health and the environment raised an interest for studying alternatives to RDX-based explosives. In order to better understand the deposition of contaminants from the functioning of various munitions, deposition rate (DR) studies have recently been designed. DR studies are an effective tool to determine the masses of explosive constituents dispersed in representative detonation scenarios. Am ethod for the precise and reliable determination of constituent DR was developed by the Cold Regions and Engineering Laboratory and involves the detonation of munitions items over as urface of pristine snow [8].R DX DRs following the detonation of C4 blocks were tested using this protocol on different occasions and showed that 12 mg to 19 mg of RDX were Abstract:M any nation's armed forces are undertaking efforts to minimize the environmental impacts of live-fire military training. Based on this, the Canadian Department of National Defence has undertaken ap roject to examine potential alternatives to the use of Composition C4, an RDX-based plastic explosive. Plastic explosives are widely used by all armed forces for both military engineering tasks and explosive ordnance disposal and their use may lead to the deposition of explosives in the environment, namely RDX, in the case of C4. RDX is very stable in the environment, water soluble, and moves relatively rapidly towards surface and groundwater bodies. One option identified as apotential RDX-free formulation is apentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) based plastic explosive, commercially available in Germany and referred to as Seismoplast. In order to measure the environmental impacts of this formul...