2011
DOI: 10.1080/03601234.2011.535371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of non-extractable 14C- and 13C-sulfadiazine residues in soil including simultaneous amendment of pig manure

Abstract: Recently, we reported on soil fate of SDZ residues amended with pig manure treated with ¹⁴C-labeled sulfadiazine ¹⁴C-SDZ). The first objective of the present study was to determine whether this strategy can be substituted by application of ¹⁴C-SDZ to soil. The second objective was to characterize non-extractable SDZ residues by fractionation, size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and solid state ¹³C-NMR. The fate of ¹⁴C-SDZ was examined for 28 d, using two soils with and without amendment of pig manure. Minerali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(89 reference statements)
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was different for the nonsterile treatments (see below), where both the RES and NER fractions showed pronounced initial sorption. This behavior is also reported in the literature for SDZ (e.g., Schmidt et al, 2008; Junge et al, 2011) and for other organic contaminants (Heistermann et al, 2003).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This was different for the nonsterile treatments (see below), where both the RES and NER fractions showed pronounced initial sorption. This behavior is also reported in the literature for SDZ (e.g., Schmidt et al, 2008; Junge et al, 2011) and for other organic contaminants (Heistermann et al, 2003).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…While Heuer & Smalla () observed that SDZ promotes antibiotic resistance for over 2 months at concentrations in the mg kg −1 range, this increased difference in relative abundance of sul1 on day 63 may further suggest a selection for resistant bacteria and an influence of SDZ on the soil bacterial community at more realistic, very low easily‐extractable concentrations. It should be noted, however, that despite low concentrations of SDZ detected in bulk and rhizosphere soils, there still might be sites with higher concentrations of SDZ because of a heterogeneous distribution of humic substances in soil that rapidly integrate SDZ (Junge et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…into the soil is not usually possible as has been proven in the findings of Kreuzig and Höltge (2005), who discovered that about 18% of sulfadiazine in dung-fertilized soil was still extractable even after incubation for 100 days. While some antibiotics are photodegradable, a study by Junge et al (2011) revealed that photodegradation of antibiotics in the soil is limited due to inadequate penetration of light and should not be considered as another option for the degradation of antibiotics in the soil. Leaching is the vertical percolation of materials into the groundwater that preferentially occurs in a particular flow path and plays more of a role with antibiotics that are hydrophilic and/or not tightly sorbed to the soil particles (Jechalke et al, 2014).…”
Section: Complete Biodegradation or Alteration Of Antibiotics Dischargedmentioning
confidence: 99%