1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1656(97)00084-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of native crystalline cellulose in the cell walls of Oomycota

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, needless to say, possession of cellulase and hemicellulase activities does not by itself directly indicate the assimilation of terrestrial plant residues. For example, cellulose is also a major component of the cell walls of oomycetes (Helbert et al, 1997), and β-1,3-glucan and β-1,4-mannan are found in the cell walls of some types of fungi (Ruiz-Herrera, 1992). Corbicula japonica might mainly assimilate oomycetes and fungi colonizing plant residues rather than the plant residue itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, needless to say, possession of cellulase and hemicellulase activities does not by itself directly indicate the assimilation of terrestrial plant residues. For example, cellulose is also a major component of the cell walls of oomycetes (Helbert et al, 1997), and β-1,3-glucan and β-1,4-mannan are found in the cell walls of some types of fungi (Ruiz-Herrera, 1992). Corbicula japonica might mainly assimilate oomycetes and fungi colonizing plant residues rather than the plant residue itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitatively, however, the particles positively identified during this 24-h pe- riod using the chitin stain comprise only ∼ 18 % of the total PBAP observed in the supermicron mode. This discrepancy could indicate the presence of spores of fungus-like species with cell walls comprised of skeletons not made of chitin, such as many yeasts, Cryptomycota, and Peronosporomycota (formerly Oomycota) (Bartnicki-Garcia, 1968;Helbert et al, 1997;Petersen and Rosendahl, 2000;Jones et al, 2011). Another possibility is that the remaining fraction is biological (e.g.…”
Section: Focus Period Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cellulose nanofibers have been characterized and extracted from algae (Valonia) [32], wood [33], tunicate [34], sugar beet [35], brown algae (Oomycota) [36], bacterial and commercially available microcrystalline cellulose [13]. Some cost effective sources such as wheat straw [21], flax, hemp, kraft pulp, rutabaga [5,37], grass [11,12], and sisal fibers [6], have also been explored.…”
Section: Extraction Of Cellulose Nanocrystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%