2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-016-1440-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of mean transit time at large springs in the Upper Colorado River Basin, USA: a tool for assessing groundwater discharge vulnerability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transit times of groundwater flow further confound the interpretation of baseflow water quality trends because there is limited understanding of the time delay between when projects implemented on the land surface would begin to affect baseflow conditions observed in the stream. Solder, Stolp, Heilweil, and Susong () found that groundwater from springs in the UCRB is relatively young and responded quickly to hydrologic variability, with 20% of the sampled spring water estimated to be less than 15 years old and 50% of the sampled spring water less than 80 years old. These findings suggest that some changes to baseflow load due to SCP implementation could be observed within a decade of implementation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transit times of groundwater flow further confound the interpretation of baseflow water quality trends because there is limited understanding of the time delay between when projects implemented on the land surface would begin to affect baseflow conditions observed in the stream. Solder, Stolp, Heilweil, and Susong () found that groundwater from springs in the UCRB is relatively young and responded quickly to hydrologic variability, with 20% of the sampled spring water estimated to be less than 15 years old and 50% of the sampled spring water less than 80 years old. These findings suggest that some changes to baseflow load due to SCP implementation could be observed within a decade of implementation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A disconnect seems to exist between catchment and groundwater TT communities. Whereas catchment studies using lumped models and stable isotopes often focus on short TTs of days and months (e.g., Birkel et al, 2012;Dunn et al, 2010;Peralta-Tapia et al, 2016) the TTs studied by the groundwater community using groundwater models and tracers such as dissolved gases and radioactive isotopes are generally in the order of years and decades (e.g., Basu et al, 2012;Eberts et al, 2012;Gilmore et al, 2016;Solder et al, 2016;Stewart & Morgenstern, 2016;Visser et al, 2009;Visser et al, 2013). The coupling between groundwater TTDs and stream discharge is especially used in the assessment and prediction of stream discharge from (nitrate) polluted aquifers (e.g., Böhlke & Denver, 1995;Duffy & Lee, 1992;Zhang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental tracers—such as stable isotopes, noble gases, tritium, and radiocarbon—can be used to estimate the residence time of discharging spring water (Kreamer and Springer , Solder et al. ). In some cases, oxygen and hydrogen isotopes can also indicate the general elevation at which recharge occurred, and thereby provide information about the spring source area and flow‐path length (James et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solder et al. () demonstrated that springs with longer groundwater residence times respond more slowly to interannual variation in precipitation and also noted that such springs may be slower to recover from long‐term droughts. In low‐gradient groundwater systems, however, even large‐volume springs with relatively long groundwater residence times may respond quickly to interannual changes in recharge due to a loss of hydraulic head during dry periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%