2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-015-0266-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Indian clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.) genotypes using qualitative morphological traits

Abstract: Clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.) is commonly known as guar, a legume with drought hardiness suited to arid regions remained a neglected and underutilized crop till the shale rush began, of late it got momentum in the international market, and it became one of the most promising industrial crops in India. Seeds of clusterbean are used for extraction of gum which is called guar gum or guaran. Guar gum-a galactomannan polysaccharide-has many uses such as in the oil and petroleum industries (shale … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most variable population was India 3, with Mahalanobis' square distance values ranging from 11.657 to 77.110, followed by the two other Indian accessions (India 1 and India 2), while the four accessions from the USA showed the lowest variability (data not shown). These results perfectly fit with the achievement of Manivannan et al (2016). The phenotypic variability of the four studied unregistered genotypes (South Africa, India 1, India 2 and India 3) reflects their wide genetic variability.…”
Section: Seed Morpho-colorimetric Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most variable population was India 3, with Mahalanobis' square distance values ranging from 11.657 to 77.110, followed by the two other Indian accessions (India 1 and India 2), while the four accessions from the USA showed the lowest variability (data not shown). These results perfectly fit with the achievement of Manivannan et al (2016). The phenotypic variability of the four studied unregistered genotypes (South Africa, India 1, India 2 and India 3) reflects their wide genetic variability.…”
Section: Seed Morpho-colorimetric Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…), as well as in Pakistan (BR 90,BR 99,etc. ), but there are also many unregistered genotypes which show a very low homogeneity and not always high agronomic traits (Manivannan et al, 2016). Generally, varietal identification is done following official protocols, based on morphological and physiological characters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence there is a need to use alternate descriptors which are rapid, accurate and less affected by environment. Several molecular marker types are available and each has their advantages and disadvantages (Manivannam et al, 2016). The molecular marker based seed purity assay could be a better alternative and is receiving more attention as these are not influenced by genotype and environment interactions, making DNA barcoding as the most straight forward method for cultivar identification (Naresh et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological attributes of crops have been employed as characterization tools among crops such as clusterbean (Manivannan et al, 2016), groundnut (Makinde and Ariyo, 2013), cowpea (Manggoel et al, 2012). Morphological traits has also been used to determine the extent of genetic variation among purple and yellow nut sedge accessions (Cruz and Baltazar, 2001, Peña-Fronteras et al, 2009, Okoli et al, 1997, Casimero et al, 1999.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%