2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of foot-and-mouth disease virus from outbreaks in Ecuador during 2009–2010 and cross-protection studies with the vaccine strain in use in the region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(60 reference statements)
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mutated binding sites identified by the mAbs for ECU/4/10 are located on the antigenic sites 1a, 1b, 2, 4 and one on non-neutralizing site. This result of high antigenic variation is consistent with previously reported data for the ECU/4/10 isolates [28]. Viruses circulating in Ecuador during the years 2009–2010 were examined using monoclonal antibody profiling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mutated binding sites identified by the mAbs for ECU/4/10 are located on the antigenic sites 1a, 1b, 2, 4 and one on non-neutralizing site. This result of high antigenic variation is consistent with previously reported data for the ECU/4/10 isolates [28]. Viruses circulating in Ecuador during the years 2009–2010 were examined using monoclonal antibody profiling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results showed that the viruses lost reactivity with the four mAbs, three of them with neutralizing properties. Moreover, results obtained with in vivo challenge indicated a lack of protection by the vaccine virus (O1/Campos) [28]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies the challenge was with a homologous virus. Protection against heterologous challenge has been shown for serotypes A in cattle [8] but similar studies with serotype O did not yield satisfactory results [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, a single test is specific for only one serotype. The strip test for serotype O cannot detect the isolate, ECU4/10, which was isolated in Ecuador in 2009 and 2010 (Maradei et al, 2011). Amada et al (2014) developed a multiplex strip test for the serological survey of hantavirus infections in humans, but there was no test available for multiplex FMDV detection using a single LFI strip test, until now.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%