2002
DOI: 10.2208/jscej.2002.720_99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Feces for Describing the Aerobic Biodegradation of Feces

Abstract: Characterizationof organic matter attending biodegradability is a common practice when a bio-kinetic model is used to describe the reaction rates at which organic matter of wastewater is biodegraded. However, procedures for characterizing organic matter contained in feces have not been reported yet. This paper deals with the characterization of feces; two approaches for characterizing organic matter of feces are discussed based on physicochemical determinations and biological response during aerobic degradatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average COD obtained for faecal material at the surface of the 16 pits investigated was found to be 0.603 gCOD/g dry sample, which is significantly lower than the approximate value of 1.13 gCOD/g dry sample obtained from the characterisation study of fresh faeces by Nwaneri (2009) and other values reported in the literature, such as that of Almeida (1992) and Lopez (2002). Also, there was a significant difference in the amount of volatile solid (58%gVS/gTS) at the surface of the pit compared to that of faeces (84% gVS/gTS) and the average biodegradability obtained for the surface layer (52%) of the pit was found to be significantly lower (80%) than that of fresh faeces values reported in the literature.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…The average COD obtained for faecal material at the surface of the 16 pits investigated was found to be 0.603 gCOD/g dry sample, which is significantly lower than the approximate value of 1.13 gCOD/g dry sample obtained from the characterisation study of fresh faeces by Nwaneri (2009) and other values reported in the literature, such as that of Almeida (1992) and Lopez (2002). Also, there was a significant difference in the amount of volatile solid (58%gVS/gTS) at the surface of the pit compared to that of faeces (84% gVS/gTS) and the average biodegradability obtained for the surface layer (52%) of the pit was found to be significantly lower (80%) than that of fresh faeces values reported in the literature.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…The COD values of feces reported in the literature showed greater variability than those of urine. The fecal COD value used in this study is the average of the following values (g/person/day): 48 (Takahashi et al, 1989), 34 (Bennett and Linstedt, 1975), 68 (Nwaneri et al, 2008), and 87 (Lopez Zavala et al, 2002), assuming a dry mass of feces of 60 g/person/day (Gao et al, 2002). The daily volume of gray water is typical of rural areas in China (Haase, 2011).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variation is attributed to subjects' diet, age, health, lifestyle, climate and geographical region (Lopez Zavala et al, 2002;Buzie-Fru, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%