1996
DOI: 10.2527/1996.7481784x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of DNA polymorphisms in three populations of hereford cattle and their associations with growth and maternal EPD in line 1 herefords.

Abstract: Three populations of Hereford cattle differing in inbreeding levels and genetic potential for growth were genotyped for seven DNA polymorphisms. The populations were compared to determine differences in allele frequency and genetic variation. Significant differences in allele frequency among the populations were found at six of the seven polymorphisms genotyped, and average genetic variation differed as expected when inbreeding levels were considered. Effects of several polymorphisms on growth and maternal EPD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
2
14

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
44
2
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Two alleles at each RFLP marker were present in both Canchim and Charolais. Although previous reports indicate the influence of κ-casein and β-lactoglobulin on maternal effects in beef cattle (Moody et al, 1994), no significant variation of allele frequencies was observed over generations of Canchim. A highly significant variation (P < 0.01) was observed for GH AluI polymorphism, with a linear increase of the allele coding for valine (V) at position 127 of this peptide ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Allele Frequency Variationmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Two alleles at each RFLP marker were present in both Canchim and Charolais. Although previous reports indicate the influence of κ-casein and β-lactoglobulin on maternal effects in beef cattle (Moody et al, 1994), no significant variation of allele frequencies was observed over generations of Canchim. A highly significant variation (P < 0.01) was observed for GH AluI polymorphism, with a linear increase of the allele coding for valine (V) at position 127 of this peptide ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Allele Frequency Variationmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Li et al (2002) detected QTLs for birth weight at 20 to 30 cM and 65 to 75 cM intervals in a Bos taurus breed. An association between IGF-1 and weights was detected by Moody et al (1996) in Hereford cattle and by Pereira (2002) for birth weight and yearling weight in the same Canchim samples investigated here. An association between IGF-1 and growth was reported in swine by Casas-Carrillo et al (1997) and in mice by Horvat and Medrano (1995).…”
Section: Qtl Mappingmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Marker TEXAN15 is located at 4.2 cM of candidate gene IGF-1 and marker BMS1248 at 15.4 cM. QTLs influencing growth and other traits have been reported in this interval (Moody et al, 1996;Davis et al, 1998;Stone et al, 1999;Pereira, 2002). Deviations in the allelic frequencies of microsatellite TEXAN15 were reported in a Nellore population selected for weight, suggesting its association with a QTL affecting this trait (Merzel et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ge et al (2001) reported an effect of the IGF-I/SnaBI polymorphism, located in the regulatory region of the IGF-I gene, on growth traits in Angus cattle, also suggested a direct action of this polymorphism on gene transcription and, consequently, on phenotypic traits. Moody et al (1996) observed an effect of STR polymorphism on body weight at birth and at weaning, and with the growth rate In Hereford cattle, Siadkowska et al (2006) reported a correlation between the polymorphism in the 5'-non coding region of the IGF-I and meat and milk production traits in Polish HF cattle. Finally for the reason that quantitative traits are regulated by many genes and affected by interactions among them, and thus, a candidate gene associated with a trait in one population may have a different effect, or show no effect at all, in another population due to negative effects of other genes and epistatic interactions of the candidate gene with other genes in the population (Pomp, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%