2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26330-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of different bubble formulations for blood-brain barrier opening using a focused ultrasound system with acoustic feedback control

Abstract: Focused ultrasound combined with bubble-based agents serves as a non-invasive way to open the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Passive acoustic detection was well studied recently to monitor the acoustic emissions induced by the bubbles under ultrasound energy, but the ability to perform reliable BBB opening with a real-time feedback control algorithm has not been fully evaluated. This study focuses on characterizing the acoustic emissions of different types of bubbles: Optison, Definity, and a custom-made nanobubbl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
90
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar dependence on microbubble gas volume and not on size or size distribution was observed for blood brain barrier (BBB) opening using focused ultrasound [27]. Nanobubbles with similar gas volumes to commercially available micron-sized UCAs, Definity and Optison, were shown to be more reliable for BBB opening, which could be a result of its smaller size and larger number of bubbles present [28]. A recent report by our group showed that at similar gas volumes, nanobubbles are less affected by changes in gas volume concentration compared to microbubbles [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar dependence on microbubble gas volume and not on size or size distribution was observed for blood brain barrier (BBB) opening using focused ultrasound [27]. Nanobubbles with similar gas volumes to commercially available micron-sized UCAs, Definity and Optison, were shown to be more reliable for BBB opening, which could be a result of its smaller size and larger number of bubbles present [28]. A recent report by our group showed that at similar gas volumes, nanobubbles are less affected by changes in gas volume concentration compared to microbubbles [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Bubble gas volume is typically estimated theoretically by assuming a bubble sphere, calculating its volume, and subtracting the bubble shell volume accordingly [26][27][28]. For a phospholipid bubble, the theoretical amount of gas is typically quantified by taking into account that the thickness of the bubble shell is 2.5 nm (typical lipid bilayer thickness is 5 nm and a bubble shell is a lipid monolayer) [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanobubbles were synthesized using previously published protocols 25,45 . Briefly, unlabeled NBs were made dissolving a lipid mixture of DPPC (1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine), DPPA (1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate), DPPE (1,2dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine) (Avanti Polar Lipids, Pelham, AL), and mPEG-DSPE (1,2-distearoyl-phosphatidylethanol-amine-methyl-poly ethylene glycol conjugate-2000) (Laysan Lipids, Arab, AL) in chloroform in a 4:1:1:1 mass ratio.…”
Section: Nanobubble Synthesis and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, modalities that increase the BBB amenability for the cure of CNS ailments are highly valued. For instance, the focused ultrasound has been reported to open the BBB via micro/nanobubbles formation (Bing, Hong et al 2018, Wu, Aurup et al 2018) and allow maximum drug accumulation in the brain. Recently, Liu et al employed focused ultrasound to reversibly break the BBB and enhance the TMZ localization in GBM from 6.98 to 19 ng/mg (Liu, Huang et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%