2010
DOI: 10.1364/oe.18.006900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of deformable mirrors for spherical aberration correction in optical sectioning microscopy

Abstract: In this paper we describe the wavefront aberrations that arise when imaging biological specimens using an optical sectioning microscope and generate simulated wavefronts for a planar refractive index mismatch. We then investigate the capability of two deformable mirrors for correcting spherical aberration at different focusing depths for three different microscope objective lenses. Along with measurement and analysis of the mirror influence functions we determine the optimum mirror pupil size and number of spa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This provides the information required to drive the DM with chosen aberration modes, rather than directly with individual actuator signals. A range of such methods have been developed specifically for use in microscopes, using interferometry, 23 image based measurements 24,25 and phase diversity. 26,27 Spatial light modulators have been used less frequently in microscopes for aberration correction, due to their polarisation dependent operation and sensitivity to wavelength when used in the common modulo 2p mode.…”
Section: Adaptive Correction Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides the information required to drive the DM with chosen aberration modes, rather than directly with individual actuator signals. A range of such methods have been developed specifically for use in microscopes, using interferometry, 23 image based measurements 24,25 and phase diversity. 26,27 Spatial light modulators have been used less frequently in microscopes for aberration correction, due to their polarisation dependent operation and sensitivity to wavelength when used in the common modulo 2p mode.…”
Section: Adaptive Correction Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This matrix describes the relation between measured responses of actuator and coefficient associated with the basis employed for least square, to replicate ideal DM shape. 14,15 The column vectors of the transfer matrix, which represent the slope of the phase generated by the DM, form the natural (zonal) bases for DM beam shaping by iterative algorithms. However, due to the linear dependence between the columns of the matrix due to the cross-coupling effect, it is suboptimal choice for expressing the measured wavefronts.…”
Section: Openloop Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different models are used amongst the literature. [22][23][24] Taking the median of the normalized radial profiles within the linear region (-40 to +40 V), we fit the DM influence function with a 2D Gaussian model (see Fig. 5, bottom right) possessing the following parameters: amplitude = 0.97 and standard deviation = 0.494.…”
Section: Modeling Of the Influence Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%