1976
DOI: 10.2527/jas1976.43127x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Biological Types of Cattle I. Dystocia and Preweaning Growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
58
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
15
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The paired comparisons of terminal sire breeds provided by these data gave rankings of Chi > C (2.5Vo), Chi > S (4.27o) and Chi > L (11.47o) for birth weight (P < 0.0001) and Chi : C : S > L by 67o (P < 0.0001) for all postweaning growth traits measured (Table 4). For the C, S and L terminal sires the results agree with those reported by Smith et al (1976 Notter et al (1978) and Gaskins and Anderson (1980 …”
Section: Sex and Location Differencessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The paired comparisons of terminal sire breeds provided by these data gave rankings of Chi > C (2.5Vo), Chi > S (4.27o) and Chi > L (11.47o) for birth weight (P < 0.0001) and Chi : C : S > L by 67o (P < 0.0001) for all postweaning growth traits measured (Table 4). For the C, S and L terminal sires the results agree with those reported by Smith et al (1976 Notter et al (1978) and Gaskins and Anderson (1980 …”
Section: Sex and Location Differencessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The individual direct effect of the Limousin was less (P<.01) than that of the Simmental, but similar to those of the Charolais and the Chianina. Smith et al (1976) found that Limousinsired calves weighed significantly less at 200 d than Charolais-and Simmental-sired calves, which were similar. The individual additive effect of the Gelbvieh was significantly less than those of the previously mentioned breeds and was greater (P<.01) than those of the Tarentaise, Shorthorn, Polled Hereford and Angus breeds, which were similar.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The Polled Hereford maternal additive effect was less (P<.01) than that of the Shorthorn and Hereford. Numerous reports have documented the maternal superiority of the Angus over the Hereford breed of dam (Gregory et al, 1965(Gregory et al, , 1978a(Gregory et al, , 1979Smith et al, 1976). Notter et al (1978) observed no significant differences in weaning weights of calves out of Hereford-Charolais and Angus-Charolais cross cows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of dystocia in Charolais sired calves due to high BW has been well recognized by a number of authors (Laster et al, 1973;Smith et al, 1976). Pahnish et al (1969) reported that the Charolais as breed of sire produced heavier calves at birth than the Charolais as breed of dam.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%