2014
DOI: 10.1128/ec.00181-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Biofilm Formation and the Role of BCR1 in Clinical Isolates of Candida parapsilosis

Abstract: eIn Candida parapsilosis, biofilm formation is considered to be a major virulence factor. Previously, we determined the ability of 33 clinical isolates causing bloodstream infection to form biofilms and identified three distinct groups of biofilm-forming strains (negative, low, and high). Here, we establish two different biofilm structures among strains forming large amounts of biofilm in which strains with complex spider-like structures formed robust biofilms on different surface materials with increased resi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
47
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(84 reference statements)
12
47
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact has already been demonstrated in several studies; it has also been reported that biofilm formation by Candida parapsilosis is a key virulence factor in this species, highly dependent on the strain [51,52], an unproven characteristic in other NAC species such as C. glabrata and C. tropicalis [51]. In our case, from all the clinical C. parapsilosis sensu stricto isolates sorted according to biofilm biomass, concurrent results with those from Silva et al [48] and Pannanusorn et al [52] were found, since we identified strains with different biofilm-forming capacity (high, low and nonexistent), where high biofilm-forming capacity strains predominated in both RPMI and YPD media (71 % and 79 %, respectively). This result also agrees with the findings from Silva et al, given that in the clinical C. parapsilosis sensu stricto isolates analyzed by them regarding biofilm-forming capacity, oral isolates were found to be the most common biofilm producers with respect to strains from vaginal and urinary tracts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…This fact has already been demonstrated in several studies; it has also been reported that biofilm formation by Candida parapsilosis is a key virulence factor in this species, highly dependent on the strain [51,52], an unproven characteristic in other NAC species such as C. glabrata and C. tropicalis [51]. In our case, from all the clinical C. parapsilosis sensu stricto isolates sorted according to biofilm biomass, concurrent results with those from Silva et al [48] and Pannanusorn et al [52] were found, since we identified strains with different biofilm-forming capacity (high, low and nonexistent), where high biofilm-forming capacity strains predominated in both RPMI and YPD media (71 % and 79 %, respectively). This result also agrees with the findings from Silva et al, given that in the clinical C. parapsilosis sensu stricto isolates analyzed by them regarding biofilm-forming capacity, oral isolates were found to be the most common biofilm producers with respect to strains from vaginal and urinary tracts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Proteomics analysis of biofilm matrix isolated using this optimized method revealed the presence of specific proteins (including glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and pyruvate kinase) in the biofilm matrix. Additional Candida genes implicated in biofilm formation include ACE2 ( 93 ), YWP1 ( 94 ), HWP1 ( 95 ), LL34 ( RIX7 ) ( 96 ), ALS3 ( 97 , 98 ), GAL10 ( 99 ), VPS1 ( 100 ), SUR7 ( 101 ), GUP1 ( 102 ), PEP12 ( 103 ), TPK1/2 ( 104 ), NRG1 (transcriptional repressor) and its target BRG1 (GATA family transcription factor) ( 105 ), UME6 (transcriptional regulator), HGC1 (a cyclin-related protein), SUN41 (a putative cell wall glycosidase), EFG1 ( 106 , 107 ), STV1 and VPH1 (Golgi/vacuolar subunits of vacuolar proton-translocating ATPase isoforms) ( 108 ), CEK1 (map kinase) ( 109 ), CDK8 ( 88 ), BCR1 ( 110 ), SPT20 ( 111 ), and SAC1 (PIP phosphatase) ( 112 ). In addition, quorum sensing molecules (such as 3R-hydroxy-tetradecaenoic acid [3R-HTDE, a beta-oxidation metabolite of endogenously present linoleic acid] [ 113 ]), farnesol ( 114117 ), and cis -2-dodecenoic acid (BDSF) ( 118 ) and metabolic processes (e.g., carbohydrate assimilation, amino acid metabolism, and intracellular transport) ( 119 ) and glycolytic flux and hypoxia adaptation ( 120 ) have been suggested to play critical roles in Candida biofilm formation.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Biofilm Formation and Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofilms are defined as microbial communities encased in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances . The composition and regulation analysis of gene expression for the constitution of biofilms comes mainly from studies on pathogenic yeast such as Candida sp . However, there are also studies that have focused on other yeasts with biotechnological interest such as S. cerevisiae .…”
Section: Metabolic Production By Yeast Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 99%