Characterization of bacterial biota in the distal esophagus of Japanese patients with reflux esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus

Abstract

BackgroundThe distal esophagus harbors a complex bacterial population. We hypothesized that a better understanding of bacterial communities in the esophagus would facilitate understanding of the role of bacteria in esophageal disease. Here, we investigated bacterial composition in the distal esophagus in subjects with a normal esophagus, reflux esophagitis, and Barrett’s esophagus.MethodsTwo biopsy specimens were obtained from the distal esophagus at 1 cm above the gastroesophageal junction under endoscopic examination in 18 patients (6 each with normal esophagus, reflux esophagitis, and Barrett’s esophagus) and used for histological examination and DNA extraction. Fragments of 16S rDNA genes were amplified by PCR using general bacterial primers, and bacterial populations were examined. A third biopsy specimen was taken from the patients with Barrett’s esophagus to histologically confirm the replacement of squamous epithelium with columnar epithelium in the distal esophagus.ResultsEndoscopic diagnoses of normal esophagus, esophagitis, and Barrett’s esophagus were confirmed by histological findings. The total amount of bacterial DNA detected did not significantly differ among groups (p > 0.1). On average, each of the 18 subjects yielded about 350 clones, of which 40 were randomly picked and sequenced. Analysis of 147 16S rDNA sequences from 240 clones of 6 subjects with normal esophagus yielded four phyla, Proteobacteria (49%), Firmicutes (40%), Bacteroidetes (8%), and Actinobacteria (3%). Similar analysis of 139 16S rDNA sequences from 240 clones of 6 patients with reflux esophagitis yielded 6 phyla, Proteobacteria (43%), Firmicutes (33%), Bacteroidetes (10%), Fusobacteria (10%), Actinobacteria (2%), and TM7 (2%). while that of 138 16S rDNA sequences from 240 clones of 6 cases of Barrett’s esophagus yielded 5 phyla, Firmicutes (55%), Proteobacteria (20%), Bacteroidetes (14%), Fusobacteria (9%), and Actinobacteria (2%). Thus, microbial communities differed among patients with a normal esophagus, reflux esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus.ConclusionsEsophageal bacterial composition differs under conditions of normal esophagus, reflux esophagitis, and Barrett’s esophagus. Diverse bacterial communities may be associated with esophageal disease.

Review of the gut microbiome and esophageal cancer: Pathogenesis and potential clinical implications

“…As the microbiomes did not differ between GERD and Barrett's esophagus patients, the authors concluded that inflammation and intestinal metaplasia are associated with global alteration of the microbiome in the distal esophagus. Using culture‐independent techniques, Liu et al 44. examined the bacterial composition at the 16S rDNA gene site in subjects with a normal esophagus, reflux esophagitis, or Barrett's esophagus.…”

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Novel Concepts of Proton Pump Inhibitors as Antifibrotic Drugs

“…For example, comparison of the esophageal microbiome among patients with reflux disorders such as reflux esophagitis and Barrett esophagus to that of the microbiome in normal subjects revealed the transformation of the esophageal microbiome to gramnegative bacteria in the disease setting (58)(59)(60). In addition, studies have found association between increased abundance of specific bacterial sequences or bacterial loads and IPF disease progression, including the rate of lung volume decline (61)(62)(63).…”

Global Epidemiology of Campylobacter Infection

“…The bacterial communities detected in these sites are primarily characterized by members of four phyla: the Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria (113)(114)(115)(116)(117)(118). Recent studies have demonstrated that Campylobacter species, and C. concisus in particular, are among the dominant species present in patients with GERD and BE (113,119).…”