2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of an Iodinated Rectal Spacer for Prostate Photon and Proton Radiation Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with our findings, the previous study has also shown that HU override is necessary for iodinated spacer. 34 In their study, they suggest HU override as a possible solution to increase the accuracy of the proton dose calculation. However, TPSs like RayStation and Pinnacle (Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Milpitas, CA) do not have an HU override option, but rather, they provide a material density override option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In agreement with our findings, the previous study has also shown that HU override is necessary for iodinated spacer. 34 In their study, they suggest HU override as a possible solution to increase the accuracy of the proton dose calculation. However, TPSs like RayStation and Pinnacle (Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Milpitas, CA) do not have an HU override option, but rather, they provide a material density override option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean HU of 120 is based on our measurement using solid water phantom and patient data from our institution and reported values in previous studies. 32 , 34 3D smoothing was applied to reduce the pixelation effect and simulate the realistic texture of hydrogel. All analyses were done using our MATLAB‐based in‐house image processing toolbox.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, these rectal spacers are difficult to visualize on CT scans, which can make the contouring accuracy of the prostate and rectum challenging. This can potentially lead to higher inadvertent radiation to the surrounding structures during the planning phase if CT is the only modality available [ 20 ]. Due to the intrafractional and interfractional motions of the prostate, the treatment plan can be altered between the planning phase and in-treatment images based on changes in patient anatomy with a kV cone beam CT (CBCT) [ 20 ].…”
Section: Spacersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary function of the SpaceOAR Vue™, namely, stable and consistent peri-rectal spacing, has recently been objectively compared to that of its non-iodinated predecessor. In a rigorous longitudinal comparison analysis, it was found that, despite a moderately overall smaller average delineated volume, SpaceOAR Vue™ provided comparable relative prostate–rectal separation, appropriate positioning, stability over a course of EBRT, and dosimetric consistency without significant changes in plan quality or robustness relative to SpaceOAR™ ( 17 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%