2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-012-2350-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of airborne particulate matter collected at Jakarta roadside of an arterial road

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A study by Pandey et al (2013) conducted in the vicinity of human activities observed that the concentrations of Cd, Cr, Ni, and Pb in PM 2.5 showed higher excess cancer risk (ECR) due to those particle-bound metals compared to guideline level set by USEPA. Satsangi et al (2014) also reported a higher cancer risk from Cr, Ni and Cd in PM 2.5 compared to the USEPA guideline. The integrated carcinogenic risk of six metals (Cr, As, Co, Pb, Ni, and Cd) in PM 2.5 in Tianjin, China were in the range 3.4×10 −3 -4.1×10 −3 , which is reportedly beyond the tolerance level .…”
Section: Health Risk Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study by Pandey et al (2013) conducted in the vicinity of human activities observed that the concentrations of Cd, Cr, Ni, and Pb in PM 2.5 showed higher excess cancer risk (ECR) due to those particle-bound metals compared to guideline level set by USEPA. Satsangi et al (2014) also reported a higher cancer risk from Cr, Ni and Cd in PM 2.5 compared to the USEPA guideline. The integrated carcinogenic risk of six metals (Cr, As, Co, Pb, Ni, and Cd) in PM 2.5 in Tianjin, China were in the range 3.4×10 −3 -4.1×10 −3 , which is reportedly beyond the tolerance level .…”
Section: Health Risk Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…LCR represents the excess lifetime cancer risk described in terms of the probability that an exposed individual will develop cancer because of that exposure by age 70 as defined by US EPA Risk Communication (http://www.epa.gov/superfund/community/pdfs/toolkit/ risk_communicati-onattachment6.pdf). The carcinogenic risk from the lifetime exposure of those hazardous metals is regulated by the acceptable or tolerance level (1 × 10 −6 ) set by the US EPA, which corresponds to lifetime exposure to an unpolluted environment (Satsangi et al, 2014). , the concentration of PM 2.5 is much higher with respect the guideline set by all regulatory bodies.…”
Section: Health Risk Assessment Of Pm 25 and Associated Various Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Moreover, Fe, Cu and Mn concentration in Jakarta are 141.33 ng/m 3 , 5.56 ng/m 3 , and 7.24 ng/m 3 respectively. 17 When compared to Senayan, Harmony, and Semanggi, which is the location that has the highest concentration of Fe, Cu, and Mn, the levels obtained from previous studies are much lower. Fe, Cu, and Mn concentration in this study are six times, 20 times, and four times higher compared to the study conducted in Jakarta.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…That result is in line with previous studies conducted around the highway in the Netherlands and Jakarta where the highest concentration of sulfur in fine particles reach to 1,426.60 ng/m 3 and 1,177.02 ng/m 3 respectively. 17 The high concentration of S occurs due to sulphur usability as an impurity agent of fuel and lubricant additives. 18 Cross & Hunter, 19 in another study stated that sulphur particles appear as a trace species of diesel engines fuels and as lubricants additives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation