2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a morphogenetic furrow specific Gal4 driver in the developing Drosophila eye

Abstract: The ability to express a gene of interest in a spatio-temporal manner using Gal4-UAS system has allowed the use of Drosophila model to study various biological phenomenon. During Drosophila eye development, a synchronous wave of differentiation called Morphogenetic furrow (MF) initiates at the posterior margin resulting in differentiation of retinal neurons. This synchronous differentiation is also observed in the differentiating retina of vertebrates. Since MF is highly dynamic, it can serve as an excellent m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eye-antennal discs from wandering third instar larvae were dissected, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), and stained following the protocol 85 – 87 . The primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-Dlg (1:200; a gift from K. Cho), mouse anti-Wg [1:50,Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank,(DSHB)], rat anti-Elav (1:50; DSHB), mouse anti-Dlg (1:100; DSHB), mouse anti-22C10 (1:100; DSHB), mouse anti-Chaoptin (MAb24B10) (1:100; DSHB 88 ), mouse anti-Ey (1:100, DSHB), mouse anti-Eya (1:100, DSHB), mouse anti-Dac (1:100, DSHB), mouse anti-β-galactosidase (1:100; DSHB), rabbit anti-β-galactosidase (1:200) (Cappel), and mouse anti-GFP (1:100, GFP-G1, DSHB).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eye-antennal discs from wandering third instar larvae were dissected, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), and stained following the protocol 85 – 87 . The primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-Dlg (1:200; a gift from K. Cho), mouse anti-Wg [1:50,Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank,(DSHB)], rat anti-Elav (1:50; DSHB), mouse anti-Dlg (1:100; DSHB), mouse anti-22C10 (1:100; DSHB), mouse anti-Chaoptin (MAb24B10) (1:100; DSHB 88 ), mouse anti-Ey (1:100, DSHB), mouse anti-Eya (1:100, DSHB), mouse anti-Dac (1:100, DSHB), mouse anti-β-galactosidase (1:100; DSHB), rabbit anti-β-galactosidase (1:200) (Cappel), and mouse anti-GFP (1:100, GFP-G1, DSHB).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adult flies were prepared for imaging by freezing at −20°C for ~2 hr (Sarkar, Gogia, Farley, Payton, & Singh, ; Wittkorn, Sarkar, Garcia, Kango‐Singh, & Singh, ). Images were captured on a stereomicroscope attached to a camera.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eye-antennal imaginal discs were dissected from the wandering third-instar larvae in 1X phosphate buffered saline (PBS), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min, and washed in PBS. We stained the tissue with a combination of antibodies following a previously published protocol Sarkar et al, 2018a). The primary antibodies used were rat anti-Embryonic Lethal Abnormal Vision (ELAV) (1:50; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, DSHB), mouse antidiscs large (Dlg) (1:100; DSHB), rabbit anti-Dlg (1:200; a gift from Dr. K. Cho), mouse anti-6E10 (1:100), rabbit anti-βgalactosidase (1:200; Cappel), mouse anti-22C10 (1:100; DSHB), and mouse anti-Chaoptin (MAb24B10) (1:100; DSHB) (Zipursky et al, 1984).…”
Section: Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%