2007
DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00249.2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a human surfactant protein A1 (SP-A1) gene-specific antibody; SP-A1 content variation among individuals of varying age and pulmonary health

Abstract: The human surfactant protein A (SP-A) locus consists of two functional genes (SP-A1, SP-A2) with gene-specific products exhibiting qualitative and quantitative differences. The aim here was twofold: 1) generate SP-A1 genespecific antibody, and 2) use this to assess gene-specific SP-A content in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). An SP-A1-specific polyclonal antibody (hSP-A1_Ab 68-88 _Col) was raised in chicken, and its specificity was determined by immunoblot and ELISA using mammalian Chinese hamster ova… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

7
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variations of the ratio of SP-A1 to total SP-A protein content have been observed as a function of pulmonary disease and aging (44). Therefore, the relative levels of SP-A1 and SP-A2 proteins could relate to disease susceptibility and/or function as predictors of disease specificity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Variations of the ratio of SP-A1 to total SP-A protein content have been observed as a function of pulmonary disease and aging (44). Therefore, the relative levels of SP-A1 and SP-A2 proteins could relate to disease susceptibility and/or function as predictors of disease specificity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of these findings, it was hypothesized that eB is a cis-acting regulatory element for both transcription and translation (42,48,50). Moreover, eB confers SP-A 5=UTR variants with differential capabilities of modulating expression, and this in turn may contribute to differences observed in SP-A levels among individuals under several conditions (e.g., lung disease, aging) (44,53). However, the location and properties of cisacting elements in the UTRs of SP-A1 and SP-A2 transcripts have not been described.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no differences have been observed between SP-A1 and SP-A2 in their ability to inhibit hemagglutination activity of influenza A virus (40). Quantitative differences include differences between the SP-A1 and SP-A2 genes and/or variants in basal mRNA levels and in response to dexamethasone (22,33,48,58) and in protein levels in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids from different individuals (52). Mechanisms involving NF-B activation (21,28) and mRNA stability and translational control (57) may contribute to quantitative differences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the increased sensitivity to infection that some individuals exhibit after ozone exposure, as assessed by higher risk of common infections in areas with highly polluted air (42), may reflect the involvement of intrinsic or genetic factors and/or the functional impairment of oxidant-exposed SP-A. Different individuals may possess different combinations of SP-A variants and proportions of SP-A1 and SP-A2 content (52). Because different SP-A variants have been identified with qualitative and quantitative differences, and functional differences between SP-A1 and SP-A2 have been observed (15,20,39,43,56,60,61), we speculate that the ratio of SP-A1 to SP-A2 is a better indicator of the overall ability of hSP-A to enhance phagocytosis in the lung than the total SP-A content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, SP-A2 showed higher biological activity in inducing TNF␣ production by THP-1 cells (92,93), stimulating Pseudomonas aeruginosa association with rat alveolar macrophages (58,59) and inhibiting phosphatidylcholine secretion from alveolar type II cells (87). The relative amounts of SP-A1 and SP-A2 vary and seem to be affected by age and health status (81,94). The functional difference between the two products can probably be explained by structural and oligomerization differences (71,87,91).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%