1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb10996.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a Digitonin‐Solubilized Bovine Brain H3 Histamine Receptor Coupled to a Guanine Nucleotide‐Binding Protein

Abstract: The H3 receptor is a high-affinity histamine receptor that inhibits release of several neurotransmitters, including histamine. We have characterized H3 receptor binding in bovine brain and developed conditions for its solubilization. Particulate [3H]histamine binding showed an apparently single class of sites (KD = 4.6 nM; Bmax = 78 fmol/mg of protein). Of the detergents tested, digitonin at a detergent/protein ratio of 1:1 (wt/wt) yielded the greatest amount of solubilized receptors, typically 15-30% of parti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, according to this model, high‐affinity H 3 ‐receptor agonist binding could result from either binding to preformed high‐affinity receptor states (R* and R*G) or from the induction of these high‐affinity states through binding to low‐affinity receptors (R). Low‐affinity agonist binding in buffer B (0.07,0.1,0.1) can be explained by considering that, under these conditions, the agonist binds only to the low‐affinity receptor state (R) and cannot bind to or induce the formation of R* or R*G. Although, at the time these studies were performed it was not definitely known that the H 3 ‐receptor was G‐protein coupled because it had not yet been cloned, the possibility that agonists could induce H 3 ‐receptor ternary complex formation was supported by studies suggesting that these receptors were linked to effector systems through G‐proteins ( Arrang et al ., 1990 ; West et al ., 1990 ; Zweig et al ., 1992 ; Clark et al ., 1993 ; Litosch et al ., 1993 ; Clark and Hill, 1995 ; Clark and Hill, 1996 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, according to this model, high‐affinity H 3 ‐receptor agonist binding could result from either binding to preformed high‐affinity receptor states (R* and R*G) or from the induction of these high‐affinity states through binding to low‐affinity receptors (R). Low‐affinity agonist binding in buffer B (0.07,0.1,0.1) can be explained by considering that, under these conditions, the agonist binds only to the low‐affinity receptor state (R) and cannot bind to or induce the formation of R* or R*G. Although, at the time these studies were performed it was not definitely known that the H 3 ‐receptor was G‐protein coupled because it had not yet been cloned, the possibility that agonists could induce H 3 ‐receptor ternary complex formation was supported by studies suggesting that these receptors were linked to effector systems through G‐proteins ( Arrang et al ., 1990 ; West et al ., 1990 ; Zweig et al ., 1992 ; Clark et al ., 1993 ; Litosch et al ., 1993 ; Clark and Hill, 1995 ; Clark and Hill, 1996 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 3 H]NAMH was chosen as the radioligand for H 3 receptor binding in the present study. This agonist has been widely used and proven to be suitable for H 3 receptor binding studies (Korte et al, 1990 ; Cumming et al, 1991 ; Zweig et al, 1991 ; Ryu et al, 1996). Another tritiated H 3 receptor agonist used in binding studies is ( R )α‐[ 3 H]methylhistamine (see, e.g., Pollard et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Lovenberg et al . (1999) reported the cloning and characterization of a human G‐protein‐coupled H 3 ‐receptor in agreement with some previous evidence to suggest that this receptor could be G‐protein‐coupled (Arrang et al ., 1990; Zweig et al ., 1992; Clark & Hill, 1995; 1996). Some compounds have been shown to directly activate G‐proteins (Detert et al ., 1995; 1996; Leschke et al ., 1997) and therefore we considered whether this action could explain the discrepancies observed for the homologues of histamine (VUF8326, VUF4701, VUF4702 and VUF4732).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%