2019
DOI: 10.26866/jees.2019.19.4.272
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a 1 mm (DC to 110 GHz) Calibration Kit for VNA

Abstract: This paper presents an evaluation method for a 1 mm coaxial calibration kit that can be used from DC to 110 GHz. The analytical model for the calibration kit was revisited and verified by comparing it with the electromagnetic High-Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS). We also proposed a method to measure or appropriately estimate the physical parameters of the analytic model. This approach calculates the uncertainty based on the physical parameters, so that the uncertainty can be appropriately propagated to di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the data described are based on the same OSL calibration ensuring a fair comparison between the presented de-embedding methods. An alternative solution to the performed process is based on the replacement of the open and load with two additional offset shorts [54, 55]. The three-offset shorts (SSS) approach is capable of achieving single port calibration on transmission media where it is difficult to realize loads or opens.…”
Section: Physical Properties and S-parameter Measurements Of Utc-pdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the data described are based on the same OSL calibration ensuring a fair comparison between the presented de-embedding methods. An alternative solution to the performed process is based on the replacement of the open and load with two additional offset shorts [54, 55]. The three-offset shorts (SSS) approach is capable of achieving single port calibration on transmission media where it is difficult to realize loads or opens.…”
Section: Physical Properties and S-parameter Measurements Of Utc-pdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement uncertainty of the RF comb generator can be estimated from each covariance of the measured pulse S pulse , the frequency response of the oscilloscope S H , the adapter impedance S Sxx , the reflection coefficient of the comb S Gcomb , the reflection coefficient of the oscilloscope S Gscope , and the repeat measurement S repet as follows: the covariance S pulse can be obtained during the nonlinear optimization using equation ( 1), which is found in detail in Hale et al 9 and Cho et al; 10 the covariance S H can be found in Cho et al 5 as explained in the previous section; and finally, the covariances S Sxx , S Gcomb , and S Gscope are obtained from the physical parameters of the cal kit (Table 1) 14,15 through the impedance calibration process 16 S phase = J pulse S pulse J 0 pulse + J H S H J 0…”
Section: Analysis Of the Measurement Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…scope and PD are the reflection coefficients of the RTDO and the PD, and S xx is the S parameters of the adapter. The impedance of the adapter, source, and PD was measured using a vector network analyzer (VNA), and the measurement uncertainty was analyzed based on the physical parameters [8], [9]. Therefore, the full covariance between not only real and imaginary values but also all frequency values can be obtained and it can be converted from the frequency domain to the time domain and vice versa [10].…”
Section: E Calibration Of Impedance Mismatchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where σ represents the standard deviation of the variables. Generalizing (9) to the matrix form can be expressed as the product of the Jacobian matrix and the covariance matrix [13]. Thus t is propagated to the covariance of the measured pulse align as follows:…”
Section: A Uncertainty Of the Measured Pulse Using The Rtdomentioning
confidence: 99%