2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1431927616000805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization at Atomic Resolution of Carbon Nanotube/Resin Interface in Nanocomposites by Mapping sp2-Bonding States Using Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy

Abstract: Functionalization is critical for improving mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes (CNTs)/polymer nanocomposites. A fundamental understanding of the role of the CNT/polymer interface and bonding structure is key to improving functionalization procedures for higher mechanical performance. In this study, we investigated the effects of chemical functionalization on the nanocomposite interface at atomic resolution to provide direct and quantifiable information of the interactions and interface formation between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This energy loss is greater than or equal to the binding energy of the electrons in the CNT sample that interact with the incident electrons, which results in absorption edges in the EELS spectrum at element-specific energies. The spectral intensity of the oxygen adsorption edge can be compared to that of other elements to determine the atomic percentage of oxygen in a CNT sample, while the near-edge structure of the C K-edge (C 1s) spectra provides information on the local bonding environment (i.e., sp 2 - and sp 3 -hybridized carbon and the ratio of σ* to π* antibonding orbital character) . Similar to EELS, NEXAFS also creates element specific absorption edges, with a near-edge structure that provides information on the local bonding environment.…”
Section: Quantification Of Surface Oxidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This energy loss is greater than or equal to the binding energy of the electrons in the CNT sample that interact with the incident electrons, which results in absorption edges in the EELS spectrum at element-specific energies. The spectral intensity of the oxygen adsorption edge can be compared to that of other elements to determine the atomic percentage of oxygen in a CNT sample, while the near-edge structure of the C K-edge (C 1s) spectra provides information on the local bonding environment (i.e., sp 2 - and sp 3 -hybridized carbon and the ratio of σ* to π* antibonding orbital character) . Similar to EELS, NEXAFS also creates element specific absorption edges, with a near-edge structure that provides information on the local bonding environment.…”
Section: Quantification Of Surface Oxidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectral intensity of the oxygen adsorption edge can be compared to that of other elements to determine the atomic percentage of oxygen in a CNT sample, while the near-edge structure of the C K-edge (C 1s) spectra provides information on the local bonding environment (i.e., sp 2 -and sp 3 -hybridized carbon and the ratio of σ* to π* antibonding orbital character). 115 Similar to EELS, NEXAFS also creates element specific absorption edges, with a near-edge structure that provides information on the local bonding environment. NEXAFS requires a tunable Xray source typically provided by a synchrotron, limiting the ease of its routine use.…”
Section: Quantification Of Surface Oxidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can see that the 1s-π* peak at 285 eV, corresponding to sp 2 carbon, gradually decreases with increasing P - T conditions, and is finally absent for the AC70-1 sample recovered from 30 GPa and 1100 °C. Using sp 2 glassy carbon as the standard material, the percentage of sp 3 −hybridized carbon is quantified as high as 96.2 ± 0.9% from a calculation of the ratio of integrated areas under the π* and σ* peaks 29 , 38 . The results indicate that C 70 transforms into nearly pure sp 3 amorphous carbon at 30 GPa and 1100 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 Polyurea interacts with CNT through π − π, 29 CH−π, 17,29 and NH−π 34,35 noncovalent interactions, as it contains nitrogen as well as aromatic and aliphatic groups (Figure 1f). 44 Studies on the interfacial characterization of polymer−CNT composites have been conducted using Raman spectroscopy, 20 wetting measurements, 45 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), 17,45 X-ray scattering, 30 electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS), 46,47 and CNT pullout tests using atomic force microscopy (AFM). 48−51 Theoretical 52,53 and computational models 11,54,55 have been developed and utilized toward this end as well.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on the interfacial characterization of polymer–CNT composites have been conducted using Raman spectroscopy, wetting measurements, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), , X-ray scattering, electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS), , and CNT pullout tests using atomic force microscopy (AFM). Theoretical , and computational models ,, have been developed and utilized toward this end as well. Raman spectroscopy has proven to be a powerful tool for characterizing the interfacial load transfer. , The tensile strain in CNTs results in a Raman band frequency downshift (D ∼ 1300 cm –1 , G ∼ 1580 –1 , and G′ ∼ 2600 –1 ), which in turn is associated with the weakening of C–C bonds .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%