1971
DOI: 10.4141/cjas71-043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Youthful Beef Carcasses in Relation to Weight, Age and Sex: Iii. Meat Quality Attributes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater marbling for heifers compared with steers was similar to that reported by others (Hedrick et al 1969;Wilson et al 1969;Martin et al 1971;Jones et al 1991). Bulls have less marbling fat than either heifers or steers (Hedrick et al 1969;Wilson et al 1969;Martin et al 1971;Jones et al 1991).…”
Section: Sex Effectssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The greater marbling for heifers compared with steers was similar to that reported by others (Hedrick et al 1969;Wilson et al 1969;Martin et al 1971;Jones et al 1991). Bulls have less marbling fat than either heifers or steers (Hedrick et al 1969;Wilson et al 1969;Martin et al 1971;Jones et al 1991).…”
Section: Sex Effectssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Bulls have less marbling fat than either heifers or steers (Hedrick et al 1969;Wilson et al 1969;Martin et al 1971;Jones et al 1991). Gender differences are most likely the result of the different reproductive hormones present in bulls and heifers, with testosterone causing the production of lean muscle and estrogen resulting in more fat deposition in muscle.…”
Section: Sex Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marbling score decreased (higher levels ofmarbling fat) from August to September (Hedrick et al 1969;Wilson et al 1969;Martin et al 1971 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Czechoslovakia, Mojto, Jedlicka, Foltys and Palenik (1982) found the proportions of bulls, cows and heifers with dark-cutting beef were 0-56, 0-14 and 0-16 respectively (of a total of 630 animals). It is widely accepted that the incidence of dark-cutting beef is higher among bulls than among steers and heifers (Martin, Fredeen and Weiss, 1971;Augustini, Fischer and Schon, 1979;Buchter, 1975). The reason for the higher incidence appears to be a greater susceptibility to stress among bulls (Martin et al, 1971) rather than any intrinsic quality of the bulls' muscles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is widely accepted that the incidence of dark-cutting beef is higher among bulls than among steers and heifers (Martin, Fredeen and Weiss, 1971;Augustini, Fischer and Schon, 1979;Buchter, 1975). The reason for the higher incidence appears to be a greater susceptibility to stress among bulls (Martin et al, 1971) rather than any intrinsic quality of the bulls' muscles. The method of handling bulls before slaughter was observed to be related to the incidence of carcasses with dark-cutting characteristics (Tarrant, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%