1979
DOI: 10.1159/000264171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Simulated Sexy Voice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
1
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, most studies that have either experimentally manipulated voice frequencies or examined natural variation in nonverbal vocal parameters found that deeper voices are perceived as less attractive in women (Pisanski and Feinberg 2019;Puts et al 2016). Nevertheless, several studies have found the opposite (Babel et al 2014;Hughes et al 2014;Pisanski et al 2018;Tuomi and Fisher 1979), perhaps because deeper voices may signal sexual interest, maturity, confidence, and/or competence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, most studies that have either experimentally manipulated voice frequencies or examined natural variation in nonverbal vocal parameters found that deeper voices are perceived as less attractive in women (Pisanski and Feinberg 2019;Puts et al 2016). Nevertheless, several studies have found the opposite (Babel et al 2014;Hughes et al 2014;Pisanski et al 2018;Tuomi and Fisher 1979), perhaps because deeper voices may signal sexual interest, maturity, confidence, and/or competence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esimerkiksi jatkuva normaalia matalampi puhekorkeus voi olla vahingollista äänelle ja aiheuttaa jopa äänihuulikyhmyjä tai granuloomia (mm. Aronson, 1973;Brodnitz, 1965;Tuomi & Fisher, 1979).…”
Section: Puheäänen Korkeuteen Vaikuttavat Sosiokulttuuriset Ja Behaviunclassified
“…Judgments of the sexiness of men's voices are also generally associated with voices with lower fundamental frequencies (Daniel & McCabe, 1992). Men who were attempting to sound sexy (Tuomi & Fisher, 1979) or who were judged to be successful seducers (Anolli & Cicero, 2002) spoke with more pitch excursion and lowered their pitch over time, although Daniel and McCabe (1992) found that mid-pitched male voices were rated the sexiest. In contrast, women rated men's voices with high F0 and greater formant spacing as less attractive than those with low pitch and less formant spacing, possibly because these voices are associated with youthfulness in male voices (Feinberg, et al, 2005).…”
Section: Formant Dispersion and Pitchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings on sexiness and pitch in women's voices are also mixed. Some studies indicate that both men and women think that low pitch is sexy, because both lower the F0 of their voices when asked to sound seductive (Tuomi & Fisher, 1979) and speak in a lower pitch to attractive opposite-sex listeners (Hughes, Farley, & Rhodes, 2010), although Fracarro, et al, (2011 found that women raised their pitch instead. Farley, Hughes, & LaFayette (2013) found that women lowered voice pitch when speaking to their current romantic partners, and such voices were also judged to be sexier than those used when talking to friends.…”
Section: Formant Dispersion and Pitchmentioning
confidence: 99%