2010
DOI: 10.3109/10826081003682891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Problem Drinking in an Urban South American Indigenous Population

Abstract: This 2002 Medcen Foundation-funded study explored characteristics of problem drinking among 211 urban Venezuelan Native Americans of Arawak origin. Prevalence of problem drinking using Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Tests was 88.5% among men and 17.3% among women. Periodic binge drinking was marked by loss of control, failure to meet obligations, and alcohol-related trauma. Focus group participants noted that previous occasional binge drinking by men has been replaced by frequent male and female heavy we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite recent growth in the Mixed-Race population (Cheng & Klugman 2010), many of the methodological limitations applicable to Native American populations also pertain to Mixed-Race populations. Few existing studies have used representative samples and most have focused on individual factors or family characteristics (e.g., Jackson & Lecroy 2009; Seale et al 2010). Before the 2000 Census began to include Mixed-Race as a category, studies varied in their definition of this classification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite recent growth in the Mixed-Race population (Cheng & Klugman 2010), many of the methodological limitations applicable to Native American populations also pertain to Mixed-Race populations. Few existing studies have used representative samples and most have focused on individual factors or family characteristics (e.g., Jackson & Lecroy 2009; Seale et al 2010). Before the 2000 Census began to include Mixed-Race as a category, studies varied in their definition of this classification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26, nº 3, p. 1589-1603 -September/2018 The questionnaires refer to instruments constructed and adapted according to the particularities of the populations, interests and objectives of the studies. In addition, we have identifi ed 10 studies (Forslundl, 1978;Giuliano et al, 1998;Hughes & Dodder, 1984;Kassab, 2011;Khan et al, 2013;Lowe et al, 1997;May & Smith, 1988;O'Malley et al, 2008;Seale et al, 2010;Shore & Spicer, 2004) that used questionnaires to describe the tool used to assess alcohol use in indigenous populations. These present a pattern in their characteristics, with closed questions about the habits of consumption of alcoholic beverages, frequency, quantity, type and damages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have presented specifi c questions, such as the consequences of the use, associated or not with violence (Kassab, 2011), the evaluation of last consumption in the last six months per quarter, and the perception of pregnant women on alcohol (Khan et al, 2013), the reasons for drinking (Forslundl, 1978), the history of drinking (Lowe, et al, 1997) and beliefs about the effects of drinking and social control over the use of drink in the community (Shore & Spicer, 2004). The evaluation criteria of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV (DSM-IV) and International Classifi cation of Diseases 10th version (ICD-10), as well as the CAGE questionnaire and Alcohol Use Disorders Identifi cation Test (AUDIT) evaluation model, were guiding resources for some instruments (O'Malley et al, 2008;Seale et al, 2010;Shore & Spicer, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations