2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of immediate and fatigue strength of a dual-threaded pedicle screw in cadaveric spines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
2
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
33
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the dual-threaded screw achieved a pullout force 19% less than that of the single threaded screw when being tested in high porosity (low density) polyurethane foam models and performed only slightly better (7.8%) when tested in vertebrae with a bone density of less than 0.8 g/cm 2 . Both differences were determined to be statistically insignificant [37]. These results differ from those reported by Thompson et al [36], who stated that the surface area of the screw's thread was a good predictor of its fixation strength within bone.…”
Section: Basic Screw Designmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the dual-threaded screw achieved a pullout force 19% less than that of the single threaded screw when being tested in high porosity (low density) polyurethane foam models and performed only slightly better (7.8%) when tested in vertebrae with a bone density of less than 0.8 g/cm 2 . Both differences were determined to be statistically insignificant [37]. These results differ from those reported by Thompson et al [36], who stated that the surface area of the screw's thread was a good predictor of its fixation strength within bone.…”
Section: Basic Screw Designmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Also hoping to increase the fixation of pedicle screws through the addition of more than one thread, Brasiliense et al [37] compared a standard single threaded screw with a pitch of 2.6 mm to a screw with a pitch of 4 mm and the addition of a second parallel thread in the proximal half. They hypothesized that while the standard screw had a larger overall FOA, the dual-threaded screw had a larger FOA in the region of the pedicle, which the majority of the pullout force is dependent upon [33, 59], and therefore should increase fixation within the bone.…”
Section: Basic Screw Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material in bone model failed primarily in the shearing of a thin region the size of outer diameter of the screw as observed in studies on synthetic, human, and animal bones [61][62][63] . The different design factors that effect the pullout strength of pedicle screws can be classified as by screw parameters, such as thread type [27,52,64] , outer diameter [9] , and inner diameter or by insertion technique, such as the effect of size of pilot holes [65] , tapping [66] , and insertion angle [23] , or by augmentation technique such as polymethylmethacrylate(PMMA) [16] , or calcium phosphate (CaP) [67] . A detailed discussion regarding these factors can be read in a review paper by Shea et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the demand for pullout force also decreased due to a less active lifestyle in the elderly. With the development of screw xations such as dual-threaded pedicle screws, which may have a stronger pullout force than their single-threaded counterparts (24), and minimally-invasive surgical technology that protects the back muscle better than open surgery (11), we hypothesized that patients with low BMD who underwent PSSF may attain stabilization following surgery. In this study, patients with BMD in their lumbar region between 1g/cm 2 and 0.5g/cm 2 and a de nite history of major trauma, which was distinguished from osteoporosis with pathological fractures, were enrolled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%