2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of greenhouse gas emission in the Yellow River Delta wetland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After sampling, CO 2 , CH 4 , and N 2 O concentrations were measuredusing a 7890A gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies Co. Ltd., Palo Alto, CA, USA). The gas flux was calculated by the following equation [40]: where F represents the gas flux (mg¨m´2¨h´1); M is the molar mass of the gas to be measured; H is the height from the soil surface to the top of the chamber; V 0 is the molar volume of the gas; P is the atmospheric pressure at sampling site; T is the absolute temperature; P 0 and T 0 are air pressure and absolute temperature under the standard state condition; dc/dt is the rate of change in gas concentration. As a comparison among the treatments, estimated annual cumulative fluxes of GHGs were calculated by multiplying monthly mean fluxes by time.…”
Section: Measurement Of Ghg Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After sampling, CO 2 , CH 4 , and N 2 O concentrations were measuredusing a 7890A gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies Co. Ltd., Palo Alto, CA, USA). The gas flux was calculated by the following equation [40]: where F represents the gas flux (mg¨m´2¨h´1); M is the molar mass of the gas to be measured; H is the height from the soil surface to the top of the chamber; V 0 is the molar volume of the gas; P is the atmospheric pressure at sampling site; T is the absolute temperature; P 0 and T 0 are air pressure and absolute temperature under the standard state condition; dc/dt is the rate of change in gas concentration. As a comparison among the treatments, estimated annual cumulative fluxes of GHGs were calculated by multiplying monthly mean fluxes by time.…”
Section: Measurement Of Ghg Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After sampling, CO2, CH4, and N2O concentrations were measuredusing a 7890A gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies Co. Ltd., Palo Alto, CA, USA). The gas flux was calculated by the following equation [40]:…”
Section: Variation In Soil Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second source of uncertainty is the difference of estimated emission factors. We reviewed 2368 research articles about China's carbon emissions on the Web of Science published during 2004-2014, We found that most of the previous researches have collected emission factors from the IPCC or China's National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), whereas fewer than ten studies (less than 1% of total studies) have adopted emission factors based on experiments and field measurements [44][45][46][47][48][49]. The study show that emission factors from different sources can differ by as much as 40% [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tidal soil is neutral or alkalescence, and is mainly distributed along the river and south central plains. Salt soil distributes in the coastal areas, with a small amount of salt cultivated [10]. …”
Section: Site Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monitoring sites and Lland use characteristics of the Yellow River Delta Wetland were shown in Figure2, Table 1 and Table 2 [10]. There were 10 sites of soil samples and 5 kinds of typical salt marsh plant communities as carbon emissions monitoring site, including beaches bare land, Suaeda salsa community, mixed community of Phragmites australis and Suaeda salsa, Phragmites australis community, Tamnrix chinesi community and farmland community.…”
Section: Sampling Sites Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%