Characteristics and trends in global lead removal research: a Science Citation Index Expanded-based analysis

Kolle, Shankar Reddy; Shankarappa, T. H.; Arun, Muniyappa; Reddy, T. Bhupal

doi:10.5004/dwt.2017.20968

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 61 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Authors leading in the number of published papers on a topic are recognised as active researchers in that particular discipline (Kolle et al 2017;Kolle et al 2015). In Figure 5, the leading author's publication is based on the affiliation or contribution to an article but does not denote the position of the scholar in the author list.…”

Section: Rq2 Who Are the Leading Authors In Iol Literature?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although Europe and the USA take leading positions in the number of publications on IOL, Vogel et al (2017) argue that the language advantage of USand UK-native scholars makes it easier for them to publish research publications in highly ranked journals (however, we should note here that scholars working at universities associated with these English-speaking countries are not necessarily native to those countries). Among the papers with high citation counts are papers authored by prominent US researchers, including Lane and Lubatkin (1998) Authors leading in the number of published papers on a topic are recognized as active researchers in that particular discipline (Kolle et al, 2017;Kolle et al, 2015). In Figure 5, the leading author's publication is based on the affiliation or contribution to an article but does not denote the position of the scholar in the author list.…”

Section: Using Scopus Metrics As An Evaluative Techniquementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Interorganizational learning: a bibliometric review and research agenda

Anand

Kringelum

Madsen

et al. 2020

TLO

125

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Scholarly interest in interorganizational learning (IOL) has spiked in the past decade because of its potential to absorb, transfer and create valuable knowledge for enhanced innovative performance and sustained competitive advantage. However, only a handful of review studies exists on the topic. The evolution of IOL has not been studied explicitly and there is a lack of understanding of the field trends. To fill this gap, this paper aims to comprehensively review the literature on IOL and map its evolution and trends using bibliometric techniques. In particular, the authors use visualization of science mapping freeware to systematize the findings and interpret the results. Design/methodology/approach The authors synthesize the findings using “evaluative bibliometric techniques” to identify the quality and quantity indicators of the IOL research and use “relational bibliometric techniques” to determine the structural indicators of the IOL field such as the intellectual foundations and emerging research themes of IOL research. Findings Through an analysis of 208 journal publications obtained from the Scopus database, the authors determine the leading authors, countries, highly cited papers and their contributions to the IOL literature. By identifying the key hotspots, intellectual foundations and emerging trends of IOL, the authors provide promising avenues in IOL research. Originality/value To the best of the knowledge, this study is the first to systematically review the IOL literature and provide future research directions.

show abstract

Section: Rq2 Who Are the Leading Authors In Iol Literature?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Using Scopus Metrics As An Evaluative Techniquementioning

confidence: 99%

Interorganizational learning: a bibliometric review and research agenda

Anand

Kringelum

Madsen

et al. 2020

TLO

125

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bibliometrics analysis uses empirical evidence to explore a research field (Neely, 2005), summarizing the major research trends and subjects (Kolle et al, 2017;Yu et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2017b), guiding future researches (Zhang et al, 2017b). Assuming that the authors of a theme cited the most relevant researches in the field, evidencing the most relevant citations and co-citations (Ramos-Rodríguez & Ruíz- Navarro, 2004).…”

Section: Research Methods Stepsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Project Lifecycle Management (PLM): evolution and state of the art

Santos¹,

Reis²,

Fleury³

2020

Product

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intelligent manufacturing has produced a revolutionary change, mainly driven by the current competitive world, reinforcing the importance of inserting Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) approach. PLM emerges with the aim of efficiently managing product-related information throughout the product lifecycle with sustainability. It also satisfies the interest in managing the services and products lifecycle, and in the case of products, their management, from their insertion in production processes, to their lifecycle end, generating a closed management cycle. This paper aims mainly to understand how the concept of PLM is being approached and defined by academics. For this, a systematic literature review with bibliometrics, networks and contents analysis were applied. The goal of this paper to evidencing the main PLM definitions, providing a comprehensive view of the current researches and raising knowledge gaps for future research about it.

show abstract

“…Bibliometric analysis can provide an overall examination and quantitative viewpoint of a particular research topic supported by a large amount of literature information. In particular, it can put into reviewing the evolution and development trends of a scientific discipline to identify hotspots and emerging ideas of a field and to evaluate the performance of journals (Kolle et al, 2017). Many researchers in different subject areas have carried out the bibliometric analysis.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trends in e-literature on cardiovascular diseases: A bibliometric analysis with reference to ClinicalKey (2015 -2019)

Wadasinghe

2020

Sri Lanka Lib. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ClinicalKey is a clinical search engine that helps doctors and other health professionals to make better decisions anywhere, anytime, in any patient scenario. ClinicalKey database provides access to thousands of online resources such as online medical books, e-journals, drug monographs, guidelines, patient education, clinical overviews and multimedia resources. This paper aims to describe the bibliometric study published in ClinicalKey from 2015 to 2019 on e-literature on cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and to explore publishing trends in the relevant field. For the study, the literature was extracted in terms of fulltext research articles from ClinicalKey covering the period from January 2015 to December 2019. This quantitative study includes the bibliometric methods to analyze original articles and the data has been analyzed using statistical techniques in MS Excel and SPSS. During the period of study, a total of 8193 research articles were published, giving an average of 1639 pieces of literature per year. Results of this study revealed that the year-wise distribution of articles has a mean relative growth rate of 0.90 articles per annum and a doubling time of 2.27 years for the publications at the aggregate level. In the same way, month-wise results for the year 2015 and 2019 are, mean relative growth rate 0.45 and 0.41 articles per month and the doubling time 10.34 and 10.49 months respectively. Relative growth rate and doubling time of retrieved literature from 2015 to 2019 is stable and indicates an exponential growth of literature in the field. The analysis shows that there is a nucleus zone of journals (core journals) publishing cardiovascular diseases research output which is scattered among journals in cardiovascular diseases literature confirm to the Bradford's law of scattering.

show abstract

Characteristics and trends in global lead removal research: a Science Citation Index Expanded-based analysis

Abstract: a b s t r a c tA bibliometric analysis was performed to reveal the trends in lead removal research in 1991-2015. The

Cited by 9 publications

References 61 publications

Interorganizational learning: a bibliometric review and research agenda

Interorganizational learning: a bibliometric review and research agenda

Project Lifecycle Management (PLM): evolution and state of the art

Trends in e-literature on cardiovascular diseases: A bibliometric analysis with reference to ClinicalKey (2015 -2019)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About