2020
DOI: 10.4038/sllr.v34i2.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in e-literature on cardiovascular diseases: A bibliometric analysis with reference to ClinicalKey (2015 -2019)

Abstract: ClinicalKey is a clinical search engine that helps doctors and other health professionals to make better decisions anywhere, anytime, in any patient scenario. ClinicalKey database provides access to thousands of online resources such as online medical books, e-journals, drug monographs, guidelines, patient education, clinical overviews and multimedia resources. This paper aims to describe the bibliometric study published in ClinicalKey from 2015 to 2019 on e-literature on cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bibliometric analysis followed the three stages proposed by Aria and Cuccurullo (2017), beginning with the descriptive analysis of the document's bibliographic attributes such as publication year, author names, keywords, and other basic data. Bradford's Law (Pinto et al, 2013;Silva et al, 2023;Wadasinghe, 2020) was used to find the most relevant sources on a specific topic. Lotka's Law was also used to analyze the distribution of scientific productivity of authors in the field of study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bibliometric analysis followed the three stages proposed by Aria and Cuccurullo (2017), beginning with the descriptive analysis of the document's bibliographic attributes such as publication year, author names, keywords, and other basic data. Bradford's Law (Pinto et al, 2013;Silva et al, 2023;Wadasinghe, 2020) was used to find the most relevant sources on a specific topic. Lotka's Law was also used to analyze the distribution of scientific productivity of authors in the field of study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%