1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01048815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and mechanisms of electrorheological fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Uejima (1972) reported s y µ E 2 for cellulose fluids while for starch-based systems Chen and Conrad (1993) reported s y µ E n where n varied from 2 (no water) to 1.5 (water content range: 4-10%) and ultimately decreased to near 0 above 10% water content. The most common value of n in ER systems is 2, which is consistent with the polarization theory (Klingenberg and Zukoski 1990;Conrad and Sprecher 1991;Davis 1992;Hao et al 1998). Deviations from n = 2 cannot be explained by this theory.…”
Section: As Illustrated Insupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Uejima (1972) reported s y µ E 2 for cellulose fluids while for starch-based systems Chen and Conrad (1993) reported s y µ E n where n varied from 2 (no water) to 1.5 (water content range: 4-10%) and ultimately decreased to near 0 above 10% water content. The most common value of n in ER systems is 2, which is consistent with the polarization theory (Klingenberg and Zukoski 1990;Conrad and Sprecher 1991;Davis 1992;Hao et al 1998). Deviations from n = 2 cannot be explained by this theory.…”
Section: As Illustrated Insupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Wen et al (1997) studied the dependence of ER activity on water content in AC electric fields and concluded that water was significantly influencing the dielectric constants of fluids. Other mechanisms for the ER effect were given by Winslow (1949), Klass and Martinek (1967a, b), Klingenberg and Zukoski (1990), Conrad and Sprecher (1991), Davis (1992), and Hao et al (1998). Despite these efforts, no single model can explain all the steady and dynamic physical properties of ERFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[39] However, other studies also reported that the a value was experimentally between 1 and 2.5 depending on the magnitude or range of the electric field and the nature of the particles. [40][41][42] In this study, the deviation from 2.0 might be due to the structural inhomogenity of the SAN particles as well as the high electric field range. The AN component is thought to exist mainly at the outer phase of particles during the seeded polymerization because of its hydrophilic characteristics, and this tendency will be intensified at higher AN concentration.…”
Section: Particle Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b Å (e d 0 e c ) (e d / 2e c ) , [1] Conventional electrorheological (ER) fluids are concentrated suspensions of micrometer-sized solid particles in in-in which e d is the dielectric constant of the particulate or sulating liquids (1)(2)(3)(4). As first reported by W. M. Winslow dispersed phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%